Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This may be the game-changer the GOP needs, especially when one considers the current state of public opinion and the trend lines:

By the end of 2012, 12 states and the District of Columbia had support for same-sex marriage at or above 50%. Of these 12 states, all currently perform marriages, civil unions, or domestic partnerships for same-sex couples. Thirteen additional states presently are within 5 percentage points of majority support. In the last eight years, every state has increased in its support for marriage for same-sex couples with an average increase of 13.6%. If present public opinion trends continue, another 8 states will be above 50% support by the end of 2014.

The obvious historical parallel is also interesting in this regard:


1 posted on 10/21/2014 8:11:17 AM PDT by e-gadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: e-gadfly

Complete Bull Crap. For now.

I have no doubt the Repugs MIGHT one day have a serious contender for the top slot who is pro-faggy.

But not in 2016.


2 posted on 10/21/2014 8:14:24 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

We had one in 2012 and probably in 2008 for that matter. In fact, we probably had one in 2000 and 2004 if you ask him today.


3 posted on 10/21/2014 8:15:21 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

Their 2012 candidate was pro-homo.
Why wouldn’t the 2016 candidate be also?


4 posted on 10/21/2014 8:15:35 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Freepers aren't booing -- they're yelling "Cruuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuz")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

Comparing the acceptance of interracial marriage and homosexual marriage is like comparing apples to oranges.

The better comparison would be abortion.

And public opinion is now changing AGAINST abortion.


5 posted on 10/21/2014 8:16:09 AM PDT by Reddy (B.O. stinks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

If you had told me ten years ago that the state-by-state map would look like that, I would’ve been incredulous.

This all-out campaign by the media, the Democrats, academia, with help from complicit Republicans or Republicans willing to look the other way.. it worked. The homos had a plan, and it worked.

But at some point, the tide has to shift.


6 posted on 10/21/2014 8:19:56 AM PDT by MarkRegal05
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly
This writer shows the absurdity of the purely verbal argument.

No one, who stops to think just what is the function of marriage, throughout human history, should think of this as a rational issue. Marriage is, and always has been, about sanctifying the creation of the biological family, by the mating of the sexes in procreational activity. Marriage has always been consummated by a procreational act--whether it actually results in a pregnancy is not the point.

Same sex "marriage," is an oxymoron. You cannot have a marriage that can never be consummated, even in theory.

There are a lot of people, out there, who are going to feel very, very foolish, when a brave little boy (figuratively) points out that the Emperor is stark naked.

William Flax

9 posted on 10/21/2014 8:24:17 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah; DJ MacWoW

I smell ozone ...


11 posted on 10/21/2014 8:30:22 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

No.


12 posted on 10/21/2014 8:31:03 AM PDT by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson; TheOldLady
"This may be the game-changer the GOP needs, especially when one considers the current state of public opinion and the trend lines: "

So you think it's high time for the GOP to approve queer "marriage?"

13 posted on 10/21/2014 8:31:12 AM PDT by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly
Oh, HELL NO !
The conservative BASE would NEVER VOTE FORT THEM AGAIN !

This is what we get when we FAIL to OBEY God.
For it is written: Those who support homosexuals are against our Heavenly Father and His Son Jesus Christ.
These anti Christ people only bring destruction on us ALL.
I have NO sympathy for homosexuals!

Homosexuality is a "Mark" of disobedience.
Someone once asked The answer is in the definition of "REPROBATE". And the reason"why" is given in the Bible.

God has a cure for homosexuals.

"Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect
that God is just,
that his justice cannot sleep forever."


14 posted on 10/21/2014 8:31:46 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

Game changer? I agree. It will finally complete the divorce of the Republican Party from its social conservative base and allow the formation of the conservative party this county so desperately needs.


16 posted on 10/21/2014 8:32:19 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg ("Compromise" means you've already decided you lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

Of course the Republicans should have a pro-gay-marriage presidential candidate in 2016, assuming that they want a chance to get the votes of the dozen or so Federal circuit court judges who have decided that their power out-weighs that of the states and the wishes of the voting public at large.

The Republican party hasn’t shown much interest in what the public at large wants, so I guess we’ll be hearing all about the virtues of “marriage equality” from Jeb Bush or whatever other useless globalist drone they push on us.


20 posted on 10/21/2014 8:33:10 AM PDT by Junk Silver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

22 posted on 10/21/2014 8:36:56 AM PDT by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

We’ve lost this fight guys, it’s time to move on. If they can topple AZ, they wil be in every state. Please, let’s move on, it’s a losing battle.


23 posted on 10/21/2014 8:37:31 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

Republicans: making a decision to NOT vote them easier by the minute.


24 posted on 10/21/2014 8:37:34 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

Another reason to not vote GOP.

Will these candidates also approve jailing ministers who don’t perform gay marriage or fining Christian businesses who refuse to help celebrate gay marriage??


28 posted on 10/21/2014 8:39:35 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

One coupling produces children.

One does not (mostly despair)

It is an erroneous comparison to compare the two.

What we really have is an attempt by the political class to allow hedonism as normal to allow them to go public with their sexual behaviors.


32 posted on 10/21/2014 8:41:30 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly
Listen noob, this isn't a Republican activist forum. It's Conservative. Push your crap elsewhere.
37 posted on 10/21/2014 8:44:36 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly; FReepers
Remains Of Sodom & Gomorrah
God Wasn't Joking


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

39 posted on 10/21/2014 8:46:06 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: e-gadfly

They’ll get such a nominee without me.


43 posted on 10/21/2014 8:49:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson