Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EPA takes step in regulating drinking water
The Hill ^ | October 20, 2014 | By Laura Barron-Lopez

Posted on 10/20/2014 4:33:15 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer

The Environmental Protection Agency took the first step toward regulating a chemical in the country’s drinking water on Monday.

The EPA issued a preliminary determination to regulate the chemical called strontium, which is a naturally occurring element.

At elevated levels strontium can impact bone strength in people who don’t consume enough calcium, the EPA said.

Strontium has been found in roughly 99 percent of the public water systems in the U.S..

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: drinkingwater; epa; epaoutofcontrol; regulation; strontium; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Wake up Congress. The administrative state Marxists at EPA are doing your job.
1 posted on 10/20/2014 4:33:15 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How long before these idiots complain that there’s deuterium oxide in their water and they want it all removed?


2 posted on 10/20/2014 4:36:19 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Strontium has been found in roughly 99 percent of the public water systems in the U.S..

99%. Just a little incremental start, right?

3 posted on 10/20/2014 4:38:49 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Fight abortion & 'gay marriage' like the survival of your country depends upon it. Because it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Surely the severely conservatives Republicans will negotiate them down to control over only 98% of the water supplies.


4 posted on 10/20/2014 4:39:55 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Fight abortion & 'gay marriage' like the survival of your country depends upon it. Because it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz

If there is a single resource best monitored for contaminants it is drinking water. Having spent 30+ years working for a public water supply system I don’t see a problem here.


5 posted on 10/20/2014 4:43:10 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Crap! Now they are gonna regulate drinking water?????

I’m only 68 and I want to live to 305 and the only way I can do it is by drinking clean, regulated water.

It must be a freak of nature for all of us old people to have survived without the government regulating the drinking water. I don’t understand how I lived this long.

/sarc


6 posted on 10/20/2014 4:44:10 PM PDT by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I own & regulate my own private supply of water :>}


7 posted on 10/20/2014 4:48:35 PM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
Having spent 30+ years working for a public water supply system I don’t see a problem here.

That is precisely why EPA wants to regulate. They are a solution in search of a problem......and therefore need to be disbanded.

8 posted on 10/20/2014 4:49:36 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Man made drugs, okay. Gods minerals, bad.


9 posted on 10/20/2014 4:50:45 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz
How long before these idiots complain that there’s deuterium oxide in their water and they want it all removed?

Of course they will, it's used in pesticides.

10 posted on 10/20/2014 4:55:43 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: D Rider
Of course they will, it's used in pesticides.

And nuclear reactors!

11 posted on 10/20/2014 4:58:05 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner

Well - I wouldn’t want too much sulfer or arsenic in my water either. But with this strontium thing - maybe they will just require that more calcium be added!?

Until they find out that the strontium is good for you, or somehow balances out the little bit of sulfer or arsenic.


12 posted on 10/20/2014 4:58:42 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"Wake up Congress"

As you may or may not know, Congress enacted the Safe Drinking water Act 40 years ago.

13 posted on 10/20/2014 4:59:19 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz

And Coca Cola and anti-freeze and...............


14 posted on 10/20/2014 5:00:38 PM PDT by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I don’t know much about this. Here is one excerpt from Wikipedoia- can’t vouche whether it is accurate

“The human body absorbs strontium as if it were calcium. Due to the chemical similarity of the elements, the stable forms of strontium might not pose a significant health threat — in fact, the levels found naturally may actually be beneficial (see below) – but the radioactive 90Sr can lead to various bone disorders and diseases, including bone cancer. The strontium unit is used in measuring radioactivity from absorbed 90Sr”

Sounds like they going after the wrong problem if they are going after regular Strontium.


15 posted on 10/20/2014 5:03:44 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stboz
Of course they will, it's used in pesticides.

And nuclear reactors!

It can also be found in rivers and lakes... Something must be done immediately to eliminate all deuterium oxide... before its too late!!!

16 posted on 10/20/2014 5:04:35 PM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Strontium is used in the some of the toothpaste sold under the Sensodyne brand as a desensitizer for people with tooth and gum pain.

Strontium is also used in an off-label supplement use for those with bone decay, as Strontium is much harder than Calcium, and will replace some of it, strengthening the bone.

Bone density is usually determined by a Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, previously DEXA) test, and those who use Strontium for their bones are supposed to tell the technician about it, because their density readings will be very different from ordinary bone.

In the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, both the US and the Soviet Union conducted atmospheric nuclear tests. After some tests by the Soviet Union, the US suddenly detected much larger than normal levels of radioactive Strontium-90 in cow’s milk produced in the Midwest.

It was then discovered that for some reason, the Jet Stream had a major “downdraft” right over the Kansas-Nebraska region. So Strontium-90 isotopes created by the atmospheric tests in the Soviet Union, were carried around the world and dumped right over the American breadbasket.

Readily absorbed by grasses, that were then eaten by cows.

Very shortly thereafter, the US and USSR signed the Limited (or atmospheric) Nuclear Test Ban treaty.


17 posted on 10/20/2014 5:07:07 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

I just found out it is a supplement:
http://www.vitacost.com/vitacost-strontium-680-mg-per-serving-120-vegetarian-capsules-1


18 posted on 10/20/2014 5:07:58 PM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

“Contaminants”?
The human body absorbs strontium as if it were calcium. Due to the chemical similarity of the elements, the stable forms of strontium might not pose a significant health threat — in fact, the levels found naturally may actually be beneficial -Wiki
99% of drinking of drinking water an it poses a threat?

This is the nose of the camel b.s. .
Disband the EPA now!


19 posted on 10/20/2014 5:13:55 PM PDT by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stboz

Salt, coal, DDT, and...


20 posted on 10/20/2014 5:15:21 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson