Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed says makes breakthrough on fusion energy project
Reuters ^ | 3 hours ago | Andrea Shalal

Posted on 10/15/2014 10:50:41 AM PDT by apillar

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lockheed Martin Corp said on Wednesday it had made a technological breakthrough in developing a power source based on nuclear fusion, and the first reactors, small enough to fit on the back of a truck, could be ready for use in a decade.

Initial work demonstrated the feasibility of building a 100-megawatt reactor measuring seven feet by 10 feet, which could fit on the back of a large truck, and is about 10 times smaller than current reactors, McGuire told reporters.

In a statement, the company, the Pentagon's largest supplier, said it would build and test a compact fusion reactor in less than a year, and build a prototype in five years.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Red Badger
Gonna need a bigger tin foil hat...................

tin Lead foil hat

41 posted on 10/15/2014 11:18:13 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Uranium Foil Hat......................


42 posted on 10/15/2014 11:19:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
This after poor old what's-his-name from the LENR threads got his butt zot-radiationized.


43 posted on 10/15/2014 11:19:45 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blam

> “WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Lockheed Martin Corp said on Wednesday it had made a technological breakthrough in developing a power source based on nuclear fusion, and the first reactors, small enough to fit on the back of a truck, could be ready for use in a decade.”

Interpretation: we need grants for 10 years to fund our research. Hand over the dough...


44 posted on 10/15/2014 11:20:12 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey
kevmo, IIRC.

I put more trust in Lockheed skunkworks. The operating principle they are touting is transparent.

45 posted on 10/15/2014 11:21:25 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: blam

Re: “Hearing this for 50 years.”

Yes, I have, too.

Fusion R&D, just in America, is well over $50 billion for that period.

No question that some interesting technologies have been developed and interesting discoveries made for that money.

But, in energy terms, I can’t help but wonder if that money would have been more wisely spent on solar, fuel cells, hydrogen vehicles, and hydrogen production.


46 posted on 10/15/2014 11:23:11 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey

Kevmo. Deservedly zotted. Long overdue.


47 posted on 10/15/2014 11:23:13 AM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Right now it's just an idea. Five generations of samples to reach "prototype" stage, with each generation taking a year. Lockheed is fishing for investors.

Exactly. As with cold fusion, wake us when you actually have something with a net output of energy.

48 posted on 10/15/2014 11:23:36 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: apillar
If they've really got a self-sustaining fusion reactor, this is an awfully low-key announcement. A Q > 1 fusion reactor [of any size] would be the biggest news since, well, pretty much ever.
49 posted on 10/15/2014 11:25:13 AM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

All the hate America groups will be gearing up to find a way to put a stop to this. Can’t have anything nuclear you know.


50 posted on 10/15/2014 11:27:45 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
uranium foil hat -> Plutonium foil hat

U238 + n => U239 => Np239 + ß => Pu239 + ß

Talk about making your head explode.

51 posted on 10/15/2014 11:30:49 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: apillar

http://aviationweek.com/technology/skunk-works-reveals-compact-fusion-reactor-details


52 posted on 10/15/2014 11:31:02 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist
For no rational reason except the word “nuclear” is a part of the technology.

Don't you mean "nucular"?

53 posted on 10/15/2014 11:34:21 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The queen is their slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zencycler

The Lockheed press release doesn’t contain the word “breakthrough.” That apparently was added later by the media. So the overwhelming probability is that it doesn’t really work yet, there has been no breakthrough, and Lockheed scientists continue to work on the high beta fusion reactor technology.


54 posted on 10/15/2014 11:34:42 AM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I wasn’t aware that there WERE any current Fusion reactors....????

Well...there is one that is relatively close to us...most call it The Sun. But it's a lot bigger than 100 times the size of a pickup truck.

55 posted on 10/15/2014 11:35:27 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The queen is their slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: apillar

The press release doesn’t say it will be a net energy producer, just that it will be physically smaller than existing designs.

There are existing fusion reactors, but from what I understand, they require more energy to operate than they produce. I assume the LM reactor will have the same problem.


56 posted on 10/15/2014 11:35:51 AM PDT by barefoot_hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chad_the_Impaler
High beta fusion reactor
57 posted on 10/15/2014 11:36:43 AM PDT by Chad_the_Impaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: apillar

No worries....
Here’s your list of opponents who will get it squashed:

1-Your Population Control crowd who are deathly afraid of providing cheap energy to the third world.

2-”NUCLEAR?!?!?!....IT’s A BOMB!!!” (facts don’t matter)

3-”America doesn’t deserve cheap energy, they’ll just use it to oppress the rest of the world and further the imbalance of riches.”

4-EPA-”Where’s your emergency evacuation plan in case this blows up?!!?” (”we have an empire to expand here, ya know”)


58 posted on 10/15/2014 11:38:03 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Well...there is one that is relatively close to us...most call it The Sun.

Can't use that one - it's been implicated in Global Warming.

59 posted on 10/15/2014 11:38:28 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I don’t see any mention of them actually building a lab counter sized scaled down version. If they did, then other companies / universities would be scrambling to build their own.

Sounds like an interesting concept, but they will run into many limiting factors on the scale up, anyone of which could mean decades delay.


60 posted on 10/15/2014 11:40:26 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson