Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Heh.
1 posted on 10/10/2014 12:35:59 PM PDT by Sparklite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Hello!


2 posted on 10/10/2014 12:37:57 PM PDT by dware (3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

I think, therefore I drink...............


3 posted on 10/10/2014 12:41:48 PM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

So the secret is that he had a tumor in his nose (just saving y’all some time), but it probably wasn’t what killed him.


4 posted on 10/10/2014 12:42:56 PM PDT by chud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

They are putting Descartes before the horse.


6 posted on 10/10/2014 12:44:17 PM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

Interesting what you chose to excerpt from what is a story about Descartes’ skull.

You skipped right past the story and went straight to the end, which described the forensic expert’s qualifications.


9 posted on 10/10/2014 12:48:12 PM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

I think, therefore I wish you would not keep messing with my skull.


10 posted on 10/10/2014 12:48:35 PM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

I’ve always contended that Descartes got it backwards.

In his formulation, thought precedes being. That is incorrect. Being precedes thought.


11 posted on 10/10/2014 1:06:18 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite
Hi-tech scan of Descartes' skull reveals secret

His skull was nearly cubical, with well-defined perpendicular edges ...

20 posted on 10/10/2014 1:55:44 PM PDT by mikrofon (Bizarro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

Story’s wrong. They weren’t in the Vatican’s possession but in the care of a museum owned by the Archbishop of Tours. Check the link above.

These were “relics” that first appeared in 1869 in a pharmacy and were deposited in the museum in 1963.

If you read French, here’s the full account:

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeanne_d%27Arc#Reliques

Frankly, their provenance raises such immediate red flags that I’d be surprised if no one turned up an eyebrow over this at the time.


25 posted on 10/10/2014 2:12:33 PM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

Another one of those “you’ll never believe” headlines.

When I started a thread about those recently, my favorite response was: “President Truman Ends War with This Weird Trick.”


29 posted on 10/10/2014 2:33:35 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sparklite

Joan of Arc was an Eygptian cat. That’s a bombshell!


35 posted on 10/10/2014 5:32:19 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (In Soviet Russia, Police say "please" when demanding papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson