Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voters say illegal children should be denied schooling, legal rights
The Washington Times ^ | October 1, 2014 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 10/01/2014 10:22:57 AM PDT by jazusamo

Voters overwhelmingly reject extending legal protections to the new illegal immigrant children who surged across the U.S.-Mexico border this year, according to a new Rasmussen Reports poll released Wednesday.

Less than a third of voters say they want illegal immigrant children to be housed in their home states, and 53 percent said the children shouldn’t be allowed to attend taxpayer-supported public schools.

The Supreme Court has ruled that all children, regardless of legal status, are entitled to primary and secondary education in public schools, leaving some districts to face a surge of children with poor or nonexistent English language skills and other psychological trauma issues.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; children; illegals; immigration; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: jazusamo

Illegal children should be washed, checked for lice and other infestations, fed, clothed, given proper medical care, and sent home with a care package.


41 posted on 10/01/2014 11:14:58 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I’M starting to psycological problems with MY taxes paying to support illegals in the local schools.


42 posted on 10/01/2014 11:16:08 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
It should be illegal for schools to allow illegal children into the school.
There should be a law where landlords should be required to check if renters are illegals. They could use the same system that employers are supposed to use.
43 posted on 10/01/2014 11:16:45 AM PDT by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd

And here I thought we were a civilized nation.


44 posted on 10/01/2014 11:23:46 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Pollster1

A functional system would also do what it takes and spend the money it takes to shut down the southern border to the fence jumpers. We’ve always got billions to spend on foreign aid and every other thing under the sun. The southern border can be sealed, but our oligarchs have their various reasons for not doing it (and for not immediately deporting the invaders coming here to steal from and/or criminally prey upon us).


45 posted on 10/01/2014 11:24:27 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Don’t worry , what could be wrong with 10’s of thousands of unvaccinated , infectious disease exposed kids flooding into schools that their parents never paid taxes to support.

His little girls won’t get the riff raff viruses and TB exposures but your kids just aren’t as important as his kids are, doncha know?


46 posted on 10/01/2014 11:30:58 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (2 Timothy 4:7 deo duce ferro comitante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ray76; All
"The case is Plyler v. Doe"

Thank you for that reference Ray76. It remains that the Supreme Court had no clear constitutional authority to decide against the states on the issue of schooling for illigal immigrants.

"A 5-to-4 majority of the Supreme Court found that this policy was in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, as illegal immigrant children are people "in any ordinary sense of the term," and therefore had protection from discrimination unless a substantial state interest could be shown to justify it." --Plyler v. Doe, Wikipedia

The post-FDR era 10th Amendment-ignoring Supreme Court got 14A wrong again imo.

Again, not only have the states never amended the Constitution to expressly protect schooling as a right, the states therefore free to discriminate on the basis of schooling imo, but non-citizens aren't clearly guaranteed constitutionally enumerated protections even if the states had ratified such an amendment.

47 posted on 10/01/2014 11:34:09 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
What entitles non citizens to an education paid for by citizens other than gov’t proclamation?

Absolutely nothing. Still, that liberal-proclaimed "entitlement" means nothing if the laws are enforced and those criminals are deported expeditiously.

48 posted on 10/01/2014 11:52:43 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Because shut up. That about sums it up...

No, really, it’s about sheeperal self-righteousness, and they are good people because they want to “help these poor kids”, and they’re better than you because you don’t want to.


49 posted on 10/01/2014 11:54:55 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I try using the analogy of having a big house but only being able to take in so many needy people before everyone starves. Most liberals don’t get it.


50 posted on 10/01/2014 12:03:17 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

You can disagree with Pyler vs. Doe

as I do...

Butttt until we get a party to represent the Citizens...
(and write laws to exclude certain areas of our lives
from Feral Courts’ vampire teeth)

it will be the law of the land.period.


51 posted on 10/01/2014 12:06:41 PM PDT by DavidLSpud ("Go and sin no more"-Rejoice always, pray continually...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Whether it “works” or not is irrelevant to liberals.
It’s not even about the “needy”.

It’s about their own self-righteousness - how they feel about themselves for their advocacy.


52 posted on 10/01/2014 12:10:05 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I know, it’s all about how they feel. I have never in my life had much use for people that are over emotional.


53 posted on 10/01/2014 12:13:43 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DavidLSpud; All
"it will be the law of the land.period."

It's all about parents waking up and making sure that their children are taught about 10th Amendment-protect state powers versus constitutionally enumerated rights.

54 posted on 10/01/2014 1:30:07 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Only if the GOP candidates make it a big issue.

Hard to do that when Boehner is calling for amnesty, of course he calls it immigration reform, but he intends to pass it right after the election with a lame duck congress.

GOPe got to luv em.

55 posted on 10/01/2014 3:25:04 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
be reported to federal agents that deport them immediately, problem solved.

This came about under Carter, but back then the illegals were just walking across the border daily and returning home at night, in Texas.

56 posted on 10/01/2014 3:27:22 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
The bottom lines is that the feds need to respect the 10th Amendment-protected voice of majority voters on this issue.

Won't happen until Governors stand and fight, but I think George Wallace ruined that option for all future Governors.

57 posted on 10/01/2014 3:31:59 PM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Looks like 0bama’s fiasco with illegal aliens could backfire on Dems in this election.


I sure hope it does! People (the ones that have a brain) are sick and tired of our tax money going to support all these illegals and now our schools are going to suffer worse than they have in the past.


58 posted on 10/01/2014 3:33:31 PM PDT by leapfrog0202 ("the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of personal discovery" Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

...53 percent said the children shouldn’t be allowed to attend taxpayer-supported public schools.

***
So 47% are fine with it? Good grief!


59 posted on 10/01/2014 3:35:52 PM PDT by Bigg Red (31 May 2014: Obamugabe officially declares the USA a vanquished subject of the Global Caliphate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WayneS

Nothing I posted was uncivilized.
Just conservative.

If you want to do something philanthropic do it with your own money. You make it clear that that is a foreign concept to you, but most people on this site see the wisdom in it.


60 posted on 10/01/2014 3:37:34 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson