Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: X-spurt

You think a 51 seat majority will not result in a liberal SCOTUS? That ignores all history. If we had 60 votes, we’d still end up with fairly liberal SCOTUS appointments by Obama. Unless they had major scandal erupt, they would get many votes from our side. Look how many voted for Kagan. She’s about as unworthy and as much of a political hack as we’ll ever see appointed.

It makes virtually no difference. I hope we get 51, but I really don’t care all that much because the impact will be miniscual if at all. More than likely our side will sign on to a bunch of crap to ‘win over’ voters for 2016. Things like amnesty that are otherwise gridlocked.


30 posted on 09/24/2014 7:51:19 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: ilgipper

FWIW, Kagan was a lot more worthy than Sotomayor. Kagan is a smart, capable lawyer well-liked by leading lawyers and leading academics from all ideological corners. Sotomayor is a thorough mediocrity who did one thing well in her career: managing to be in the right place at the right time to be “first Latina to do X” — there are a dozen liberal Latina law professors whom Obama could have drawn from but he was too risk averse to do anything but appoint a Circuit Judge.


34 posted on 09/24/2014 7:58:23 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson