Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilgipper

FWIW, Kagan was a lot more worthy than Sotomayor. Kagan is a smart, capable lawyer well-liked by leading lawyers and leading academics from all ideological corners. Sotomayor is a thorough mediocrity who did one thing well in her career: managing to be in the right place at the right time to be “first Latina to do X” — there are a dozen liberal Latina law professors whom Obama could have drawn from but he was too risk averse to do anything but appoint a Circuit Judge.


34 posted on 09/24/2014 7:58:23 AM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: only1percent

I would argue the opposite, although I think both are ultimately the same side of the coin. Sotomeyor had a long and distinguished judicial track record. Yes, her race played a part, but probably no more than gender in both of these cases. If I had been a Senator I would have voted for Sotomeyer as it is the President’s role to nominate someone as long as their is not corruption or lack of qualification. In Kagan’s case, she was already decided on any number of issues in front of the court coming from her position in the administration. She’s corrupted going in (not corrupt, but biased).


59 posted on 09/24/2014 10:57:47 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson