Emma Thompson. Would Laz bonker?
Posted on 09/22/2014 8:41:44 AM PDT by rktman
Actress Emma Thompson, arguably best known for her Best Actress Oscar in Howards End and for her courage in naming her daughter Gaia, has declared that anyone who doesn't believe in climate change is "bonkers".
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Another in a long line of hypocrites telling the rest of us how to live while they fly around the world on private jets and own massive estates.
And the useful idiots love it while they light their farts for light and heat because you can’t afford your utility bills.
What is an “Emma Thompson?”
—
What happens after an enema.
his whole argument was “consensus”.
In other words, he believes because he has been told to believe.
Emma Thompson is simply “Braindead”!!!
Emma Thompson. Would Laz bonker?
Maybe they did.
Well, he’s well-educated for purpose, at any rate. Did no one ever explain to smart guy (and this never used to need to be explained), that scientific facts are not decided by “consensus”?
Our ancestors were smarter than us in a lot of ways. They used to put signs saying “no actors allowed”. These people get paid lotsa bucks for playing “let’s pretend” all their lives, and now someone has decided that that makes them eligible to pontificate on matters of weight-people who get paid to pretend.
What a world.
There are no “fossil fuels.” The Earth has not been here long enough for oil, coal and natural gas to have been created the way the enviro-nut scientists say they were.
All of the fuels in the ground were there at the creation or have been replenished since then because they are constantly being created deep in the Earth. Some people say they are created through natural processes we don’t understand. I believe those processes are supernatural. But what is absolutely clear, based on the science, is that those fuels were not created from “dead dinosaurs” or from anything else that lived and died millions of yeats ago,
Well, Moon Unit was taken...
Still waiting for someone to explain abiotic oil. And just how many damn dinosaurs were there anyway?
Ping to post #25. We await your verdict, sir.
It makes her a fascist.
"As soon as someone says 'consensus', he is no longer talking about science, he's talking about politics."
We are shifting away from science and into the realm of religious fanaticism, where the followers of the creed, brimming with self-righteous fury, believe that they are in possession of a higher truth.
Like a religion, environmentalism is suffused with hatred for the material world and again, like religion, it requires devotion rather than intellectual rigour from its adherents.
It is intolerant of dissent; those who question the message of doom are regarded as heretics, or 'climate change deniers', to use green parlance.
And, just as in many religions, the route to personal salvation lies in the performance of superstitious rituals, such as changing a lightbulb or arranging for a tree to be planted after every plane journey.
HA HA HA HA HA GOOD ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I AGREE WITH YOU 100%! But I can’t convince anyone else!
Oh that one is GOOD! I have his book STATE OF FEAR but didn’t finish reading it yet. It is ‘fiction’ but clearly shows how climate change is a big hoax.
Also The Illumanti and Solar Flare and Thor Conspiracy. Fictions by the late Larry Burkett. Shows how the computer models were MANIPULATED to show whatever the globwull warming ‘experts’ wanted them to show. I read those in 1990s and I am going to read them again. He also predicted GPS, NSA, cashless society, armed gangs roaming US....
So does this explain Al Gore and his lefties following always predicting?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
