Shame on them!
So burn it down and leave it that way.
Is there anything at all that could make them feel sheepish?
Sounds like a threat to me. Where are the big goofs from “Homeland Security”. Arrests are in order here.
What is ‘democracy’ and democratic? Ayn Rand says this:
http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/democracy.html
“Democratic” in its original meaning [refers to] unlimited majority rule . . . a social system in which one’s work, one’s property, one’s mind, and one’s life are at the mercy of any gang that may muster the vote of a majority at any moment for any purpose.
If we discard morality and substitute for it the Collectivist doctrine of unlimited majority rule, if we accept the idea that a majority may do anything it pleases, and that anything done by a majority is right because it’s done by a majority (this being the only standard of right and wrong)—how are men to apply this in practice to their actual lives? Who is the majority? In relation to each particular man, all other men are potential members of that majority which may destroy him at its pleasure at any moment. Then each man and all men become enemies; each has to fear and suspect all; each must try to rob and murder first, before he is robbed and murdered.
The American system is not a democracy. It is a constitutional republic. A democracy, if you attach meaning to terms, is a system of unlimited majority rule; the classic example is ancient Athens. And the symbol of it is the fate of Socrates, who was put to death legally, because the majority didn’t like what he was saying, although he had initiated no force and had violated no one’s rights.
Democracy, in short, is a form of collectivism, which denies individual rights: the majority can do whatever it wants with no restrictions. In principle, the democratic government is all-powerful. Democracy is a totalitarian manifestation; it is not a form of freedom . . . .
The American system is a constitutionally limited republic, restricted to the protection of individual rights. In such a system, majority rule is applicable only to lesser details, such as the selection of certain personnel. But the majority has no say over the basic principles governing the government. It has no power to ask for or gain the infringement of individual rights.
This is just one group that plans on being in Ferguson soon.
http://obs-onthemove.org/featured/a-national-call-to-action-mass-mobe-in-ferguson/
The mobilization and contingency plans of the St. Louis area police is underway. The expectation is for widespread violence, perhaps in the magnitude of the LA riots.
anyone who disagreed with the mob needed a police escort to get out.
Like all fascist/leftists; no dissent is allowed. If you dissent you will be shown how “peaceful and loving” they are.
Why not wall off the whole town, allow the law abiding to leave and let these people deal with their own problems?
All White Folks should pack up their money and leave this South African Township
Today they carry on like the uncivilized, racist ignoramuses they really are.
Tomorrow is the day they complain about being stereotyped.
The mob mentality rules.
So, are these threats going to be on the evening news?
jive talk ... by jiveasses
Lets give into the mob! Yay!
How about a 50 cal. straight to the brain of these THUGS!!!
You say you hate racism? Nietzsche: “Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster . . . for when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”
They are becoming what they hate.
If mob threats are allowed to stand or even met with acquiescence it spreads. How many times have we heard this? 2008 Presidential election, 2012 too. Zimmerman, this. Others? I’m not particularly enthused at the prospect of trial by hooting mobs of substance abusing wards of state whose only measure of guilt or innocence is skin color.
The barbarians have spoken.
The cop getting no billed by the grand jury is going to be the Democrat’s October surprise.
The prosecutor is a Dem (and a good friend of the Dem MO governor, apparently), and there’s a lot of speculation out there in the Liberal press that he’s throwing the indictment.
I’m not saying that the cop doesn’t deserve to walk free, and the evidence I’ve seen says that the shots he took were well-justified. But a prosecutor *can* indict a ham sandwich, right? If the Dems want the cop indicted, he WILL be indicted, just like Zimmerman was.
So the prosecutor “throws” the case, the grand jury fails to indict and there are mass protests/inner city voter registration drives nationwide. We’ll see ads like those NAACPs ones from prior elections saying that not voting is to allow blacks churches to burn, blacks to be dragged behind pickup trucks, white cops to shoot down black kids in cold blood.
Blacks, who are expected to sit home this year, will be incited (particularly if there are major overreactions by urban police forces to the protests and any associated violence) and turn out in much higher numbers than expected, throwing close Senatorial elections to the Dems ...
Of course not. They don’t want justice, they want a lynching.
Who is FUNDING these paid agitators? THAT should be our FIRST and ONLY question.
Follow the money. Look to the pockets of 0bama, Sharpton or Jackson!