Posted on 09/17/2014 2:45:27 AM PDT by markomalley
Russia on Tuesday accused the West of ignoring its warnings about the growing terrorist threat in Syria, and claimed that the moderate rebel front – the one the Obama administration wants to arm as part of its anti-ISIS strategy – “no longer exists.”
The remarks by Russia’s ambassador in Geneva Alexey Borodavkin came during a session of the U.N. Human Rights Council, which was discussing the most recent report by a U.N.-mandated independent commission of inquiry into the conflict.
The report, released late last month and roughly covering the first half of this year, recorded atrocities by the Assad regime and by some of its opponents, including the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS/ISIL).
“The commission in its report,” Borodavkin told the council through a translator, “recognizes that the Syrian government is working against a huge army of trained armed terrorists.”
“The Free Syrian Army no longer exists,” he continued. “Armed groups qualified as ‘moderate’ are closely coordinating their activities with terrorist groups.”
(video at link)
The Free Syrian Army (FSA) is the mainstream rebel movement affiliated to the U.S.-recognized Syrian National Coalition which the administration wants to train and equip to fight ISIS jihadists in Syria. Lawmakers are expected to vote as early as Wednesday to authorize the proposal.
The commission of inquiry report to which Borodavkin referred does not state that the FSA no longer exists. It does say however that “ideological, political, tribal and personal” divisions and rivalries among rebel groups had prevented them from becoming more effective, and that “[e]fforts by external backers to reinforce the so-called ‘vetted moderate armed opposition’ failed to reverse the dominance of radical armed groups.”
The report also says that where “groups labeled as moderate” managed to score military successes against the regime they did so “closely coordinating with extremist groups, including the al-Qaeda-affiliated Jabhat al-Nusra.”
Borodavkin used his intervention in Geneva to chide countries – especially Western countries opposed to Syrian President Bashar Assad – for their approach to the three-and-a-half-year civil war.
“It’s clearer than ever that the real threat to Syrian statehood and the whole region is the activity of terrorist groups,” he said.
“I’d like to remind you that Russia right from the beginning suggested that we unite the efforts of the international community, the Syrian authorities and the moderate opposition to combat jihadists.
“If we had been heard at the time, the spread of this cancerous tumor could have been stopped,” Borodavkin said.
“Now, regrettably, we must admit that our worst scenarios have materialized: the Islamic State [ISIS] has seized a third of the country’s territory, have proclaimed the Syrian city of Raqqa as a capital of their ‘caliphate’ and is committing heinous crimes. This is supplemented by violent raging of other terrorist groups.”
The Russian envoy said the new international focus on countering ISIS was to be welcomed, citing a meeting convened by France on Monday at which 26 countries, Russia and the U.S. among them, expressed support for a broad campaign against the jihadist group.
Russia was willing to contribute to the effort, he said.
On the sidelines of the meeting in Paris, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Russian help in the anti-ISIS campaign included providing military and other assistance to Iraq “to strengthen its ability to ensure security.”
Moscow was “also providing military and other aid to Syria,” he said, as well as to other countries in the region, including Egypt, Yemen, Lebanon and Jordan.
Russia does not, however, support President Obama proposal to extend airstrikes against ISIS from Iraq into Syria, insisting that it would violate international law.
Agreed. Assad’s Syria is secular, as were Mubarak’s Egypt, the Shah’s Iran, even Saddam’s Iraq. They all had political restrictions for good reasons too. But socially quite liberal & “westernized”.
We don’t “keep overthrowing these people”. We’ve had only one successful longterm alliance with a somewhat secular strongman in the Middle East — Egypt.
The allies of the USSR/Russia include or included Ghaddafy in Libya; Boumeddienne in Algeria; the Assads (a hereditary dictatorship) in Syria (still holding on to part of the failed state, with help from an Iranian force and Iranian proxy thugs out of Lebanon, as well as Russian advisors and mercenaries); Saddam Hussein in Iraq — literally the only one overthrown by the US, unless one counts the Shiite-head the CIA helped overthrow to install the Shah — and Nasser in Egypt.
Nasser died. Nasser and Sadat were socialists, but also members of the Muslim Brotherhood. Sadat was a member of Egypt’s armed forces, and if memory serves was the first face the world saw of the Egyptian coup against King Farouk, as Sadat announced the new regime.
Sadat engineered a military victory of sorts against Israel, forced his own country into peace talks, expelled the Russians, allied Egypt with the US, and in order to counteract a rising tide of pro-Soviet/anti-Israel sentiment among his political colleagues, released jailed Islamofascists who wound up gunning him down in broad daylight in front of thousands of Egyptians.
His successor was ousted by the military machinery which runs Egypt, and replaced by another old-timer. Money flowing in to the Muslim Brotherhood from Qatar — an ally of Iran, and engineer of the overthrow of Saddam and the Gulf War — resulted in an uprising that led to elections and the installation of MB’s own Mohammed Morsi.
The other US allies of sorts have been the monarchies in Jordan, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, and the other Gulf States (Qatar viewed us as an ally of convenience). The GCC bankrolled the coup that ousted Morsi.
The Reagan administration botched the restoration of the constitutional republic in Lebanon by allowing the elder Assad’s Syrian army to murder the Christian leader.
I wholeheartedly agree. Assad is our enemy, and that old saw that “the enemy of your enemy is your friend” is and always has been nonsense. The enemy of your enemy may be your enemy, and that’s the case here — the proper US policy is to make sure all sides are about equally well armed and don’t run out of ammo until there’s only one (literally) left standing. The FSA has begun an alliance with the Kurds; backing Kurdish independence should be US policy, regardless, but the FSA isn’t a “moderate Islamic” group, it’s the original armed rebellion against our enemy Assad, and like the Kurds (and Assad for that matter) the FSA was under threat from ISIS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.