Posted on 09/07/2014 1:35:56 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
In an interview with ABC News, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, predicted his party would reclaim the Democratic-controlled Senate in November, but he declined to endorse current Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., as the party leader should there be a transfer of power in the upper chamber of Congress.
. . . . .
But when asked if he would endorse McConnell — currently embroiled in a tight race for his Kentucky Senate seat — as Senate majority leader, the Texas Republican said that is a decision that would be made “when the time is right.”
“Well, that will be a decision for the conference to make, but I am confident we will have a new majority leader,” he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
As am I, but sometimes it's fun, like when I spun one off kilter by asking how much he's getting paid by Reibus.
That will give people something to vote FOR.
Who wants to reward bad behavior? Besides liberals, I mean?
/johnny
No no no...you've got that all wrong.
I said; "You AND YOUR ILK" let Obama and the RATs win. (because you didn't vote against them)
And that's a fack...Jack.
Yes, I'll do it if I must, as proven by my years in uniform, but no, I don't get anything out of it like fun.
I just want to completely destroy liberal republicans forever so that they can't ever pretend to be conservative again.
It's like picking up cat puke. Some stuff ya just gotta do, even if it makes you gag.
/johnny
No sale.
And I'm really, really tired of it.
So, the fix is in.
Run a liberal republican, and they lose the general election.
That's the deal.
I will work my fingers to the bone to make that happen.
/johnny
AND-
Ole Wimpy Ears Snowe. She voted to let it come out of committee. (She's gone now, replaced by another fetid pseudoRAT)
That is true. However, Mitch must be ditched.
And the fact that Nate Silver has a tight race for Senate control only confirms that voting against is not enough.
Plus, the GOP has no national message or plan like the Contract with America.
Thanks for that additional info.
It shows it could have been stopped by Snowe or a failed cloture
vote.
You've already done that, how's that progressive agenda working out for you?
So, what's going to happen in four days? Martial law?
Some of these folks listened to me when I worked hard to campaign against Dewhurst (the establishment favorite).
Maybe not November, but eventually.
I can't vote against anyone, but I damn sure can campaign against them.
/johnny
And no, martial law (bonus for speeling it correctly {yes, that was on purpose}) won't be happening nationwide in 4 days.
The worst threat America has is republicans that are liberals.
I mean to see them politically destroyed.
It may take a while.
/johnny
For all practical purposes, it is the same thing.
May I direct your attention that way?
/johnny
You seem to be under the impression you have “a while”.
Forget it.
/johnny
I have until I'm done, and the time-pressure sales technique doesn't work on me. Standard that it is...
You are the one that needs the vote right now. I damn sure don't.
/johnny
H. Ross Perot...Right?
(Larri, Larri...Are yew payin' attention here Larri?)
Too many people have a short-sighted view of this process, thinking only of the next election, or the one after that. We’re in it for the long haul, since this situation we’re currently in took a long time to develop. I tell people this will take many, many election cycles. I’m in this for many years, and I’m blessed to know that my daughter feels the same way I do so she’ll continue the battle after I’m gone.
Ummm. No sale.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.