Posted on 08/25/2014 10:16:16 PM PDT by AZLiberty
PR Newswire
MENLO PARK, Calif., July 22, 2014
MENLO PARK, Calif., July 22, 2014 /PRNewswire-iReach/ — American company, Menlo Park based technology firm Solar Hydrogen Trends, Inc. (www.SolarHydrogenTrends.com) today announced that it has conducted a final series of control tests on hydrogen reactor Symphony 7A.
Photo – http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20140722/129200
A follow-up series of tests was required due to the fact that the two previous series of tests had shown such incredible production of hydrogen in reactor Symphony 7A, that even most reputable scientific firms were hard-pressed to accept and/or verify the test results.
New test results carried out by TRC Solutions are even more staggering: the previous performance results of 79,000 liters per hour increased to 127 cfm or 215,800 liters per hour and the content of hydrogen in the gas mixture increased from 93.1% to 97.5%. Oxygen content in the gas mixture on the exit of Symphony 7A was twice lowered to 1.34%, indicating that the process of transmutation of oxygen into hydrogen in the last test was more active.
With this performance the hydrogen reactor can convert 1 barrel of water into 200 kg of hydrogen, which is energetically equivalent to 3 barrels of oil.
However, the most impressive result of this experiment was that the external energy needed to make these 208,678 liters of pure hydrogen fell by 20%; it averaged at 414 watt hour = 4.6 volts x 90 amps.
To repeat: In these tests, 1 barrel of water = 3 barrels of oil.
At the moment this is an absolute record for energy costs with “cold fusion” Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR). It outpaces all research centers, laboratories and universities involved in the hydrogen problem of (LENR) for 20-30 years.
The ratio of spent and obtained energy in hydrogen reactor Symphony 7A in percentage is 134,477%. Today, hydrogen reactor Symphony 7A with the size of standard suitcase can produce enough hydrogen in one day equivalent to 6.5 barrels of oil, at the mere cost of $1.68 per hour to operate.
Observers should imagine two economic possibilities:
1. Barrel of oil actually would cost $5.07. (When the market price on commodities exchange trades at $100 to $110).
2. With 50,000 Symphony 7D Hydrogen Reactors (units), such a quantity would provide 30% more hydrogen equivalent than the largest oil producer, Saudi Arabia, in one year.
Solar Hydrogen Trends believes that the most expedient next step would be if the United States takes the lead as global supplier of this technology, creating a consortium of willing countries, including oil and gas producing nations, which would then all become the co-owners of this groundbreaking technology developed by American company Solar Hydrogen Trends. Since the technology is developed and owned within/by the United States, all future sales and transactions of hydrogen will be made in US dollars (Hydrodollar) jointly with petrodollar.
In this scenario, the country members of the consortium could within 20-25 years accomplish the gradual replacement of fossil fuels with hydrogen. Over the years they could diversify their economies and avoid economic dependence and/or collapse. We believe that the hydrogen era is here to stay, cannot be stopped or slowed, and should not be considered as revolutionary but rather an evolutionary worldwide progression.
The United States is the first to enter into the hydrogen era – the new evidence of American exceptionalism – and this grand step forward is precisely what makes us exceptional as a people and a country.
Hakop Jack Aganyan
Konstantin Balakiryan
Founders, Solar Hydrogen Trends, Inc.
For more information on the hydrogen reactor, test results and the Company, please visit www.SolarHydrogenTrends.com.
Makes sense to me. All of the phlogiston that has been released from burning fossil fuels is simply captured from the atmosphere and used to transmute oxygen back to its normal state (hydrogen).
” I dont have any money to invest...”
Dang! I have a couple investments that would have been perfect for you.
It’s very hard to believe this bullshit. I believe that it’s a scam to get investors (fools) on their ship.
Why?
All of the key phrases are in the body of the article like:
innovative breakthrough technology
incredible production of hydrogen in reactor Symphony 7A
firms were hard-pressed to accept and/or verify the test results.
test results carried out by TRC Solutions are even more staggering
It outpaces all research centers, laboratories and universities involved in the hydrogen problem
which would then all become the co-owners of this groundbreaking technology
and this grand step forward is precisely what makes us exceptional as a people and a country.
And last but not least: Written by.........
Hakop Jack Aganyan
Konstantin Balakiryan
Founders, Solar Hydrogen Trends, Inc.
Yep. All of the phrases and words of scam artists are there with the only exception of amazing, miracle, space age, and a whole host of other words indicating something absolutely remarkable.
They have a special sale on for buying their stock. If you buy within the next 5 minutes you will get not only the share of stock you purchased, you will get another one FREE.
Casey Kasem has transmuted and left the building!
I was fortunate to be able to buy 1,000,000 warrants to purchase company shares at $10.
Any body want some at $3.50 each?
G-Force/Battle of the Planets was my absolute favorite cartoon in 1st grade. Actually, it was the favorite of EVERY 1st grade boy in my class, I believe. I even had a BOTP lunchbox. I wonder if it is stashed away at my mom and dad's house.
Solar Hydrogen Trends, huh?
Sounds like a lot of SHT.
We give everything away. It is just utter stupidity.
I was wondering the same thing - they don’t specify the size of a “barrel”, but charitably assuming it’s a 55-gallon drum, not a 42-gallon oil barrel, they claim to get 440 lbs of hydrogen from 412 lbs of water.
Somehow circumventing the Law of Conservation of Mass.
there is insufficient information to deduce the actual process by which the H2 is generated but I did not immediately gather that the process specifically relies on "transmutation" of one element to another given that they are starting with H20 molecules. Given their name, it seems reasonable to assume that they are using solar energy to conduct electrolysis.
If they are indeed discussing an energy efficient transmutation of oxygen into hydrogen via the rearrangement of subatomic particles, that would certainly be quite different and game changing if true which seems doubtful.
as unlikely as that seems however, it does seem equally inevitable that we will one day manufacture our elements rather than mine them.
I’m skeptical. It rings of being a perpetual motion machine. Power the electric generator with hydrogen (creating water as the exhaust), use the electricity to crack the water into hydrogen and oxygen, and have a surplus of hydrogen left over.
Again, the existence of the sun and our atmosphere) within our local earthly system gets us around the second law of thermodynamics by providing near limitless energy to throw back into the system and, thereby, “fight off” the increasing entropy that would otherwise occur. It does not allow us to violate the law, but it gives us the energy to avoid its reality.
That's another clue that this is a scam. "Patent" and "secret" are mutually exclusive. In order to get a patent, the inventor MUST (at least as a matter of patent law) teach how to practice the invention, in the best way the inventor knows how to practice it.
Now, if the claim is secrecy is for "trade secret protection" purposes, THAT would make sense.
Fossil fuels are very limited in the amount of energy they can produce. They worked great for the industrial revolution and they work great in my gas tank and furnace but I think there are certain things we will want and need to do in our future that will exceed the capabilities of fossil fuels. If we agree that fossil fuels are indeed dead ancient foliage, then we have to agree that the days of fossil fuels are numbered any way you look at it.
BFL
Um, doesn't voltage times current = power? P = IE??? That would be simply Watts, not "watt hour." So what is the "hour" doing in the equation?
If these guys can't get that correct in their press release, this doesn't look credible.
I miss kevmo; that was entertainment right there
” it averaged at 414 watt hour = 4.6 volts x 90 amps”
Never trust a site that presents its most important data in a false equivalency.
“I dont have any money to invest but if I could figure out how to generate my house’s power needs with this, might not be a bad idea. But I will have to wait till the home version is in production.”
I read on FreeRepublic that there was one being delivered in first quarter 2014.
“, they claim to get 440 lbs of hydrogen from 412 lbs of water.”
You forgot to add in the weight of the barrel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.