Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoping for its own shale gale, China seeks U.S. know-how
Fuel Fix ^ | August 17, 2014 | FuelFix.com

Posted on 08/19/2014 9:15:19 AM PDT by thackney

Chinese oil companies are giving U.S. firms a bigger stake in exchange for the tools and technology of hydraulic fracturing, and many of those tools are made in Texas, or nearby.

The Chinese hope hydraulic fracturing can launch a shale production gusher as it has in the United States–although China’s formations are deeper, and some are especially challenging because they’re in remote deserts or near densely populated cities.

But the Chinese government is eager to reduce the country’s thick air pollution, and one step in that direction would be power plants that run on cleaner-burning natural gas instead of coal.

Halliburton, FTS International and other companies have entered into joint ventures with Chinese companies and are providing some of the technology needed to open up the Chinese shale.

Collin Eaton has the full story on houstonchronicle.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: china; energy; hydrofrac; shale

1 posted on 08/19/2014 9:15:19 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

U.S. takes a crack at China’s tough shale
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/U-S-fracturing-takes-a-crack-at-China-s-tough-5691345.php?cmpid=email-premium&t=b6e0d41b0981750c0d#/0

While hydraulic fracturing has engendered environmental opposition and even some local bans in the United States, the Chinese government is eager to reduce the country’s thick air pollution. It hopes the nation’s shale might provide enough cleaner-burning natural gas to replace coal in power plants.

Through a series of new joint ventures, Halliburton, FTS International and others with major operations in Texas are exporting the technological breakthroughs in U.S. hydraulic fracturing, including pressure pumps that use less water and multiwell drilling from platforms called pads that can cut down on an operator’s footprint.

The advances, the companies say, could speed up China’s sluggish quest to redo the U.S. energy gusher, tapping resources in Chinese locations ranging from a remote desert to a city larger than Houston.

Making inroads in China’s rising shale gas industry also could prop up the Texas oil field services firms in the Eastern Hemisphere’s sturdy drilling market, where they’re already servicing the state-owned oil giants in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern states.

- - - - -

Halliburton said it expects fourth-quarter profits to reach 20 percent growth in the Eastern Hemisphere. The expansion of its business in China isn’t likely to move the needle much for its $5 billion overall business in the Middle East and Asia, but it’s a bigger foothold in one of the world’s fastest-growing economies.

The China work might be more significant for Fort Worth-based FTS International, a private well completion company that has formed only a handful of international joint ventures, including one in June with China’s Sinopec.

Excerpted for Houston Chronicle


2 posted on 08/19/2014 9:16:55 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Since they’ll steal it anyway, give it to them with bogus disinformation in the documents.


3 posted on 08/19/2014 9:20:00 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

F U Red China


4 posted on 08/19/2014 9:25:17 AM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

The favorable outcome of China proceeding with extraction of shale gas and oil from deposits in their own country, is that they shall not be competing on the world market for these commodities. Which means, a huge surplus will build up, and thus drive down world prices, making energy more affordable for all.

I do not see a downside. China is going to consume the fossil fuel energy anyway, why not go for the lowering of the particulate carbon that comes with the burning of coal?


5 posted on 08/19/2014 9:29:52 AM PDT by alloysteel (Most people become who they promised they would never be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Steal it? Why, when we’ll gladly gift it to them.

Do you realize the proprietary information China demands before they allow our corporations to manufacture on their soil?

We have given every bit of knowledge we utilize in China.

China would be fifty years behind us if we hadn’t. Let that sink in.


6 posted on 08/19/2014 9:30:00 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (We'll know when he's really hit bottom. They'll start referring to him as White.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
I don't see any downside either.
The Chinese will renege on their nat gas deal with the Rooskies in 2 seconds...
7 posted on 08/19/2014 9:37:10 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Guess the “China Card” is back in play.


8 posted on 08/19/2014 9:38:01 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney
China's shale basins contain gas trapped in high-pressure formations more than 10,000 feet deep. They're generally hotter, farther underground and more complex than those in the major U.S. shale plays.

Is it local condition, locally produced equipment or the operators inexperience that slows them down?

9 posted on 08/19/2014 9:41:57 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DUMBGRUNT

Lack of equipment, lack of experience using that equipment is the biggest problem. But even if that matched the US, the last sentence you copied shows it would be harder and more expensive.


10 posted on 08/19/2014 10:46:49 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson