Posted on 08/17/2014 8:20:29 PM PDT by kristinn
Michael Brown, the unarmed black teenager who was killed by a police officer, sparking protests around the nation, was shot at least six times, including twice in the head, a preliminary private autopsy performed on Sunday found.
One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Browns skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the familys request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.
Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front.
The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Browns clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.
SNIP
Dr. Baden provided a diagram of the entry wounds, and noted that the six shots produced numerous wounds. Some of the bullets entered and exited several times, including one that left at least five different wounds.
This one here looks like his head was bent downward, he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Browns head. It can be because hes giving up, or because hes charging forward at the officer.
He stressed that his information does not assign blame or justify the shooting.
We need more information; for example, the police should be examining the automobile to see if there is gunshot residue in the police car,...
(Excerpt) Read more at mobile.nytimes.com ...
Like I said - stupid stuff.
You’d have run like hell - that is no aspersion on your character or bravery, but a compliment to your intelligence. Or you’d have advanced fast and fought like an out of control buzz saw.
Who does both? No one sensible.
Drugs are, of course, a distinct possibility. Make that probability. But it could be down to the good old adrenaline rush. He seems like a violent person from what we have heard.
Exit wounds.
Oh, and like the picture shows, no wounds to the back of the arms.
Interesting.
Consistent with poor police shooting skills, such a huge target and 4 shots to the arm..so what was the distance?
How many more shots missed?
Then 2 shots in much smaller target, the head. Someone got close for that too happen.
Was officer shooting downward for those head wounds, with round going through eye downward to neck, with Brown on the ground — excessive force, or was threat advancing nonstop then started to fall with seconds later rounds entering head in flurry of shots?
I’ve heard witnesses say two barrage of shots. We need more witnesses to know what happened.
The police will need to check the officer’s weapon to see how many bullets were fired, and match them against any shell casings they found.
Shots in the right arm are in a line so it would support police reports that the officer shot at Brown when he was bull-charging the policeman (his shots pulled to the left). The two fatal shots were PROBABLY in the spots noted by Baden, not because he was surrendering (on his knees) but because he had lowered his head in the charge as well as beginning to collapse inward due to the pain of the first 4 wounds in his arm.
Gun-powder residue locations will be critical. If none are found on Brown, or only one (if he was shot in or near the car in a struggle with the officer), then this would support the police/officer’s version of what happened.
If residue is found on Brown’s clothing/arms/head, then there is a credibility problem with the police version.
Brown’s companion in crime and his version of what happened are not credible. Check it against the forensics.
Lots of someone “said” re what was happening. This is not admissible or even credible eyewitness material.
How do you say “lying MFs”?
This is not to say that the local police used common sense in handling the mobs or the looters. You don’t put snipers on the roof of trucks, aiming their rifles at people in the street (if no violence is taking place). Making a lot of noise and saying crude things don’t need this kind of stupid response which was shown all over the world.
Also, the biggest unanswered question of the day (as asked by moi, an old street protest-covering reporter) -
Why didn’t the police get help in spotting outside agitators and then do “grab, snatch and hustle” arrests? It is an old method of grabbing key agitators from within a mob and getting them out into custody in a very quick maneuver.
The locals would have helped point out who they knew came from “the outside”.
Then those arrested could be charged with various conspiracy crimes concerning crossing various political lines to commit riot, mayhem and criminal violence.
If you get the outside agitators in the first day or so, you can break the back of organized violence and looting.
Buckshoot and Rocksalt also help (you nail a couple dozen in the legs as they are actively looting). The message will then get out to the stupid masses. “Loot, and we shoot”.
Why didn’t the city of Ferguson or even state officials make Sharpton and Jackson and known racial agitators such as the head of the New Black Panthers, post a “peace bond” of, say, $250,000 cash (based on their previous records of causing riots and looting, esp. Sharpton, and the NBPP’s racist, threatening statements to mobs)?
Seems that the law enforcement people in Missouri dont’ know a thing about mob/riot control, something I used to talk about in classes I was taking in Police Science (aka Criminology). Hell, as a student I used to lecture veteran police/FBI/Secret Service and military personnel on the anatomy of a riot and riot control tactics.
You see, I read both Police Manuals as well as the manuals of the communists which they used in the Mayday Riots, 1971 (Rennie Davis and Arthur Waskow); Marighella’s “Urban Guerrila Warfare” manual; Cuba materials, Weathermen publications, Black Panther Party publications, and misc. terrorist materials.
Also talked to military veterans who performed riot control during the 1968 riots in DC and Baltimore.
Well, somebody had to do it since a lot of American police departments had no idea how to handle domestic riots/looting.
Seems that despite all the shit that FEMA/DHS/FBI, and other law enforcement agencies are putting out in anti-Tea Party manuals, it is totally useless, aimed at peaceful American citizens, and is so politically correct that black and hispanic gangs are literally never mentioned, and you probably couldn’t find the word “communist” anywhere associated with “rioters, looters, and saboteurs”.
Only the anarchist “Black Bloc” gets an ocassional mention as a threat, but they are never taken out when they do riot. Cops or their leaders afraid of being accused of “police brutality” and violating constitutional rights to riot and loot.
Damned. I thought we learned something over the past 50 years about how to handle riotious mobs and looting, but it looks like they learned nothing. And Eric Holder is making sure that it remains that way.
You know, we've never seen all three of them in the same room at the same time, either, have we?
Hmmm.....
;-)
He would say that anyway.
Was he waving them like he just don't care?
Now that's funny - I don't care who you are!
It is strange. It is like people get alerts from different news sources, then RUSH to the computer to post them here. First. It is intriguing, but in a way, sad. “OOOH!” “I GOT AN ALERT FROM THE BLUMPKIN TIMES!” “I GOTTA POST! RIGHT NOW! I GOTTA BE FIRST!!!”
Serial thread posters are like that. They're news junkies extraordinaire, and we love 'em.
How many bullets does that officer’s gun hold???
6 in the dead kid, and more that were ‘fired’ while he was running away?
Too many for my counting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.