Posted on 08/14/2014 10:57:00 PM PDT by dragnet2
A leaked document from the Department of Homeland Securitys Office of Intelligence and Analysis predicts increased anti-government violence over the next year.
After years of only sporadic violence from violent domestic extremists motivated by anti-government ideologies, I&A has seen a spike within the past year in violence committed by......
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I dont understand. Is it the white mans turn to go looting now?
Did a Hollyweird scriptwriter write this cause it reads like leftwing fantasy. This scenerio is close to that piece of crap movie White House Down.
big bad ass federal gub mint is at war with conservatives, seems reasonable that conservatives should go after some of those who are doing such,
DHS: “as we move closer to fully implementing a totalitarian dictatorship under 0bama, we foresee violent uprisings from anti-government forces increasing”
the founders would have no problem with the above statement and would encourage citizens to join with anti-govt forces to defend the Constitution and the spirit therein.
question is... which side would today’s representatives be on? king George’s or George Washington’s?
The stage is being set. EA games just released Battlefield Hardline, where “hero” cops get to hunt down Tea Party terrorists.
Link to alleged document?
The Feds have a tendency to set up things like this.
You’re right about that. The only “safe” group that Hollywood can go after in making their movies are white, right-wing extremists that largely don’t exist (terrorists like Tim McVeigh being rare exceptions).
It make me wonder whether DHS and other agencies/police forces have learned that little trick and are doing the same thing to increase their budgets and get neat and shiney new toys.
IOW they do believe that the real threat are internal Muslim extremists and disaffected urban minorities. But they don’t dare say so, for political reasons. So they drum up a non-existent white right-wing threat in order to get the money to develop the capabilities they feel they need to counter the threat that actually exists.
One of the big things making me wonder this are the horrified/outraged reaction Liberals I know are having to the St. Louis situation. They haven’t really cared that the capability has been developed, but are extremely ticked off about how and against who it’s now being used.
Simple, follow the looters home and say howdy w a .45 drawn.
Like we see in Ferguson?
We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that weve set. Weve got to have a civilian national security force thats just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded. Barack Hussein Obama, 7/2/2008They dont call it a Civil Defense force, that would imply we need (or perhaps that we deserve) defense. The official name is National Civilian Community Corps.
I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...
At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason ~ nully's son
Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping!
To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...
The “protestors” had identical professionally printed signs “spontaneously”, and had Molotov cocktails.
Of course it is staged.
It’s DHS and the rest of them who are stirring the pot while anticipating the day We the People decide we’ve had enough of their foolishness. IOW, it’s a sting.
Looters and cop haters are playing right into Homeland Security’s hands.
I think of it as the NatCCC, or more simply, as the NatCs...
Well played.....
Are we supposed to riot first, or do we go straight to looting? I missed ‘Civil Unrest 101’ in college...
Conservatives don’t protest that way.
Bunkerville was a conservative protest.
Did I really need at </sarc> tag?
Well when you start jackbooting people around and destroy their way of life sometimes they get mad.
I’ve seen lots of posts .. but I don’t think you realize that about 10,000-12,000 people check out this website on any given day, so your comments should take that info into consideration.
Don’t take responses personally. If I was upset at what you said, I would have replied “privately”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.