Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/13/2014 5:53:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin


2 posted on 08/13/2014 5:59:48 AM PDT by Iron Munro (<i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Constitutional Scholars: Sustained Airstrikes in Iraq May Be Unconstitutional

Here's a hint to those would-be eggheads:

ANYTHING a foreign born usurper does is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

3 posted on 08/13/2014 6:01:09 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (I want a Speaker who'll stick that pen and phone where no one but Reggie Love can find it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
4 posted on 08/13/2014 6:01:19 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
<> If he does this again, however, it's safe to say cries of executive overreach will only grow louder, even if his actions are warranted and well-intentioned.<>

Precedent trumps the supreme law. Just ask Scotus.

5 posted on 08/13/2014 6:01:46 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Thanks for posting this.
I mentioned this a few days ago.

Yes, the situation in Iraq is serious.
But the United States military does NOT belong to Obama.

He did this in Libya, and now in Iraq. He is not being challenged.


6 posted on 08/13/2014 6:04:12 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He already violated the War Powers act before this, and nothing happened. So, why should he care when he knows there are no consequences?


9 posted on 08/13/2014 6:32:46 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"Constitutional? You have got to be kidding me."

Former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said that or words to that effect during questioning about the Constitutionality of OBAMACare before it was passed. That sums up the Democrat Party and Obama's disdain for our Constitution.

10 posted on 08/13/2014 6:49:05 AM PDT by mosaicwolf (Strength and Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
He has two authorizations to use military force that are still in effect, the one passed after 9/11 and the one authorizing the Iraq invasion.

The real problem here is the languorous pursuit of inconclusive conflicts that are never resolved by outright victory.

11 posted on 08/13/2014 6:50:04 AM PDT by pierrem15 (Claudius: "Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

These professors always rediscover the Constitution when the nation is at war, then forgets it at home at every chance. I think the Congress should declare war against ISIS and Islamic extremism. The Islamists know we’re at war, what good does pretending we’re not do?


13 posted on 08/13/2014 6:56:27 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

All I can say in this case is that Obama did the right thing. And, Congress should approve!


15 posted on 08/13/2014 7:00:42 AM PDT by odds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

You forget that Barry is a constitutional scholar and he knows what he is doing /sarc


16 posted on 08/13/2014 7:33:43 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Has anyone asked the ISIS constitutional law scholars what THEY think? Shouldn’t we be worried that ISIS might sue us for war crimes in the Hague? Have we heard from their lawyers?


17 posted on 08/13/2014 7:52:45 AM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This is impossible because 0bama is a Constitutional Scholar and Lecturer.


19 posted on 08/13/2014 8:35:15 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

No need to comment. That’s why the tag line says what it says.


21 posted on 08/13/2014 12:02:18 PM PDT by upchuck (It's a shame nobama truly doesn't care about any of this. Our country, our future, he doesn't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Obama is worried about doing something that’s against the constitution? That’s funny.

I haven’t heard one republican demanding he get congress’ approval.


22 posted on 08/13/2014 2:32:35 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The War Powers Act is not only unconstitutional, it is absurdly so.

First of all, the War Power of the United States is OUR power, delegated or granted to a Congress for a specific reason. It has NOTHING to do with the President, in fact, his designation as Commander-in Chief of the Army and the Navy only makes sense as the executor of powers located elsewhere.

Look at this: " the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war against the Imperial Government of Japan…"

Authorized and directed. As it should be.

24 posted on 08/13/2014 2:40:17 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’d go with Bob Turner’s statement. He’s a longtime friend of mine, a two-career Vietnam veteran (soldier and diplomatic staff), one of the US’s top scholars on law and war, and perhaps the top scholar on Thomas Jefferson and the wrongful reporting that TJ fathered a child with a slave named Sally Hemmings (it was his brother, re DNA tests).

Our Vietnam Veterans for Factual History (VVFH.org) just held a press conference in DC last week in which we discussed some of these issues re the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the circumstances around it re going to war against No. Vietnam.

There is, as Bob says, a major difference between going to war against an established state as opposed to taking counter-terrorism actions against a genocidal bunch of maniacs who have also threatened to attack our country.

I would add the following: Continue to kill all the Islamic Jihadist bastards and let the buzzards and lawyers sort them out in the sand graveyards of Iraq.


26 posted on 08/13/2014 4:12:21 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’d go with Bob Turner’s statement. He’s a longtime friend of mine, a two-career Vietnam veteran (soldier and diplomatic staff), one of the US’s top scholars on law and war, and perhaps the top scholar on Thomas Jefferson and the wrongful reporting that TJ fathered a child with a slave named Sally Hemmings (it was his brother, re DNA tests).

Our Vietnam Veterans for Factual History (VVFH.org) just held a press conference in DC last week in which we discussed some of these issues re the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution and the circumstances around it re going to war against No. Vietnam.

There is, as Bob says, a major difference between going to war against an established state as opposed to taking counter-terrorism actions against a genocidal bunch of maniacs who have also threatened to attack our country.

I would add the following: Continue to kill all the Islamic Jihadist bastards and let the buzzards and lawyers sort them out in the sand graveyards of Iraq.


28 posted on 08/13/2014 4:23:51 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’m pretty sure that if he promises “days, not weeks” he has an eight month window for unlimited airstrikes.


29 posted on 08/13/2014 4:27:40 PM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson