Posted on 08/08/2014 11:40:45 AM PDT by Kaslin
The "Republican war on women" is a fiction extracted from the imaginations of Democratic campaign strategists and endorsed by President Obama. But if the president is looking to help some oppressed people of the female persuasion, there's an opportunity at hand to wage a "war."
Abolishing child marriage is wise, moral and good politics. Child marriage adds to the fragility of fragile states, where girls are often regarded as salable commodities. The kidnapping of 275 Nigerian schoolgirls in April by the Boko Haram terrorists to sell to waiting customers was unusual, but not unique.
The child-marriage belt stretches from Africa through the Middle East and on to Asia, and the collateral damage is horrific. The casualties are little girls, forced by culture, custom and sometimes their parents into unwanted marriage. The brides are girls in their early teens, occasionally as young as 10. Love has nothing to do with it. The husbands are often brutish men in their 30s, 40s and even 50s, on the prowl to rape and own unpaid domestic servants.
Forty African heads of state were in Washington this week for a United States-Africa Leaders Summit, and though child brides were not on the official agenda, the theme of the summit was "Investing in the Next Generation." One of the week's sessions was about "investing in women for peace and prosperity," co-chaired by Michelle Obama and Laura Bush. The first lady spoke out only last week about the education of girls and for ending child marriage in developing nations. Last month, Britain and UNICEF were hosts of the International Girl Summit in London, and Britain committed nearly $100 million to a campaign to abolish female genital mutilation and forced early marriage. Momentum is clearly building to doing something about it, and child marriage has been talked about in hotels and coffee shops this week in Washington, where the African state visitors and their aides gathered.
Adolescent girls are among the most vulnerable to abuse, says the International Center for Research on Women, but such girls are among the best situated to take advantage of an education, health care and a job, if only they get the chance.
"These opportunities escape child brides," says Lyric Thompson, a policy director of the International Center, and they are "less likely to finish their education, more likely to experience violence, sexually transmitted infections, early pregnancy and complications in childbirth." This is the challenge to the visiting African leaders.
The African summit focused on big themes -- trade, energy and security -- but there's growing interest, if not always enthusiasm, for confronting primitive culture and ancient tradition to end sexual exploitation of children. One in three girls in the world will marry before 18; one in nine before she is 15. Rachel Vogelstein of the Council on Foreign Relations writes how child marriage perpetuates poverty over the generations, and its links to poor health, lack of education, violence and the usual miseries of developing nations.
Listening to the experiences of some of these young girls would break the heart of a knave. A girl named Zeinab, age 14, tells the African Union, which is campaigning against child marriage, how she was forced to marry an old man. "When I went to my husband's home, he tried to get close to me. I refused. He beat me. When I ran back to my family, they beat me, and took me back to his house." When she took a bite out of her husband's genitals, she got away.
"It is life," says the secretary-general of the World Young Women's Christian Association in Geneva. "It is not statistics."
Marriages of young girls were once common throughout the world. In ancient Greece, girls were often betrothed before puberty, and girls could marry at 12 in ancient Rome. Child marriage was expected in Imperial China. Marie Antoinette was presented to her husband for marriage when she was 15. Young girls of 15, 16 and 17 were often married on the American frontier, where Jewish and Christian clergymen strongly discouraged the marriage of girls before puberty. The practice gradually diminished in the early 20th century.
Child marriage thrives still in Africa, and particularly in Muslim countries, where it is sometimes difficult to argue against the example of the Prophet Muhammad, who married his third wife when she was 6. By Islamic accounts, he did not consummate the marriage until she was 9.
President Obama says he wants to make investment in Africa part of his legacy. The White House says a focus on the next generation "is at the core of a government's responsibility." Here's his opportunity to polish that legacy.
A noble goal, but how are they going to convince Muslims it is noble?
It’s the Musloids who do it. Mustn’t criticize the Musloids.
I don't doubt that the effect you cite is true. But the idea that opposition to "child brides" is primarily driven by a population control agenda just doesn't ring true.
I know that there are plenty of leftie kooks out there who want to save the planet by eliminating, or at least drastically reducing, the human population.
But for sane, civilized people, I think the objection to "child brides" is just driven by visceral revulsion.
I didn't imply that you were advocating for child brides. I was expressing my own revulsion at your failure to demonstrate any degree of disgust or disapproval of the practice.
I well know that the age of fertility has been getting higher in our own society over the years as women have pursued education and careers. But that certainly is not the first thought that pops into my head when I think of those poor "child brides."
Then you don't know much about the UN or global elitists. You do know that Laura Bush is both pro-abortion and pro-gay "marriage"?
I know that there are plenty of leftie kooks out there who want to save the planet by eliminating, or at least drastically reducing, the human population.
Ever heard of the Club or Rome? These aren't just "leftie kooks" but are in fact some of the most powerful people in the world. Worse, their toadies in the environmental move-mint and at the UN have committed genocides of enormous magnitude in the name of "the environment," which fits that same agenda, particularly in Africa. So I have more reason than just this article to question their motives.
But for sane, civilized people, I think the objection to "child brides" is just driven by visceral revulsion.
Which is why you "revulsed" before you considered what I posted for its actual intent. There was a reason I put "education" in quotes.
I didn't imply that you were advocating for child brides. I was expressing my own revulsion at your failure to demonstrate any degree of disgust or disapproval of the practice.
Spin. You were so overcome with revulsion for "child brides" that you missed the obvious indication in my attack on American education and my 17-year posting history here as directed at the leftists pulling these emotional strings. Further, you have apparently missed my promotion for women's education for the very demographic reasons I cited. So, BEFORE posting such an inflamed comment, did you seek clarification? No. You jumped on your charger and flamed, like a chump for a tear-jerking story. I don't think this program is all about compassion for young girls, for which I have good reason, and said so.
Sure.
Better to let young girls run wild in the streets and come home pregnant like in America.
Like we’re in any position to preach to the world on how to raise their kids.
Unless it's home economics, it's automatically drawing out female education.
Women belong at home cooking, cleaning, bearing and raising children, and bringing their husbands their slippers when they arrive home.
That is how it should be.
And because it's not that way anymore, real men don't want to get married and have kids.
One of my girls was doing calculus at the age of 11. The solution is compressing education via cross functionality, not dispensing with it.
Those are not developing nations. The inhabitants have no wish to “develop.” They are other-worldly cesspools.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
