1 posted on
08/07/2014 9:51:21 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
To this day it baffles me that Turkey ever for in
2 posted on
08/07/2014 9:58:44 AM PDT by
Viennacon
(Liberals are like vomit in a lot of ways)
To: Kaslin
I think they jumped the shark somewhere around Libya.
3 posted on
08/07/2014 10:00:45 AM PDT by
McGruff
(How's that Hopey Changey Thingy workin out for ya?)
To: Kaslin
In the 70’s, and into the 80’s, NATO was a Military Organization that could counter any conceivable threat.
When Clinton’s “Peace Dividend!” came around in the early 90’s, it became a political org, not a military one. Euro countries downsized their militaries beyond all common sense, because they believed the liberal BS that there would never be another threat again, and wouldn’t the money be better spent giving voters FREE STUUFF!
Now, “NATO” exists pretty much in name only, with the only real military organization belonging to the U.S.
4 posted on
08/07/2014 10:00:51 AM PDT by
tcrlaf
(Q)
To: Kaslin
Things are going to get real interesting with NATO when ISIS attacks Turkey, maybe not in the immediate future, but it’s coming.
5 posted on
08/07/2014 10:05:11 AM PDT by
mojito
(Zero, our Nero.)
To: Kaslin
When Russia retakes the Baltics, Nato will die.
6 posted on
08/07/2014 10:15:07 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(The GOP-e scum enlisted Democrats to steal the Republican primary. The GOP-e can go to Hell.)
To: Kaslin
“So this is how liberty dies... with thunderous applause.” ....................
7 posted on
08/07/2014 10:25:02 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
To: Kaslin
NATO end with a whimper?
Looks like it already has.
9 posted on
08/07/2014 10:30:29 AM PDT by
Joe Brower
(The "American People" are no longer capable of self-governance.)
To: Kaslin
Ismay’s comment was repeated by West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, and not so approvingly, either. But given the option of having the Russians in, Kohl wasn’t going to throw the Americans out.
12 posted on
08/07/2014 11:10:29 AM PDT by
henkster
(Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
To: Kaslin
Without US muscle and money NATO barely qualifies as a Paper Tiger let alone as an effective military force.
15 posted on
08/07/2014 11:28:42 AM PDT by
Iron Munro
(It is the duty of the patriot to protect his country from its government --- Thomas Paine)
To: Kaslin
Without America there is no NATO. It's a concept that should have ended in the 70's.
Now it has become a shakedown of US treasure and has been infiltrated by every despot
on the planet who hate America. I see no reason to support those who want us dead.
Rome paid for peace and it killed them. We have a responsibility to ourselves first.
23 posted on
08/07/2014 1:10:26 PM PDT by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: Kaslin
Fourth war in less than a century?
Actually sixth, if you count the Danish War of 1864 and the Seven Weeks' War of 1866, both caused by Prussian aggressiveness. Germany post-1871 was just an enlarged Prussia.
To: Kaslin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson