Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals Come Late to the Pot Party
Townhall.com ^ | August 6, 2014 | Jonah Goldberg

Posted on 08/06/2014 11:43:02 AM PDT by Kaslin

With the usual fanfare and self-regard we have come to expect from the New York Times editorial board, the prestigious paper has changed its mind about pot. It now believes that the federal ban on the substance should be lifted and that the whole issue should be sent back to the states to handle. Not only did it issue a big Sunday editorial (the equivalent of a secular fatwa in my native Upper West Side of Manhattan), but it has since been flooding the zone on the issue with essays from members of the editorial board.

It is a significant milestone, but not altogether in the way the Times would like. For starters, the Times is pulling a bit of a Ferris Bueller here. It is leaping out in front of a parade and acting as if it's been leading it all along. It's worth noting that the Times is 18 years behind National Review magazine and my old boss, the late William F. Buckley, and at least 40 years behind Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman, who wrote in Newsweek in 1972 that President Nixon's war on drugs should be called off even before it started.

And the libertarian flagship magazine Reason has been waiting impatiently for the rest of us since it was founded in 1968. (The left-wing Nation magazine didn't get around to an editorial backing legalization until last year.) Many GOP politicians beat the Times to the punch by years, including former Govs. William Weld of Massachusetts and Gary Johnson of New Mexico.

Conservatives and libertarians should always celebrate when liberal institutions finally catch up with them.

Still, I am more ambivalent about the national legalization craze than many of my peers, even though I've supported federal decriminalization (of marijuana, not narcotics such as heroin or cocaine) for more than a decade. I don't think smoking pot -- especially to excess -- is a particularly laudable habit for adults, and it's a very bad one for minors. There will be real social costs to legalization. But there are also real social costs to prohibition. Responsible advocates on both sides have recognized this for a long time.

Whenever policymakers in Washington are faced with a complicated issue with good arguments on both sides, the inclination should be to do nothing. That is different than saying nothing should be done. The best way to square the circle is to send the question back to the states to simmer for a while -- or forever. And on this, the New York Times' tardy position, and emphasis, on empowering states is absolutely right.

"The federal government should repeal the ban on marijuana," proclaimed the opening salvo of a six-part editorial barrage. "There are no perfect answers to people's legitimate concerns about marijuana use. But neither are there such answers about tobacco or alcohol, and we believe that on every level -- health effects, the impact on society and law-and-order issues -- the balance falls squarely on the side of national legalization. That will put decisions on whether to allow recreational or medicinal production and use where it belongs -- at the state level."

The Times' stand is also hypocritical (and not because it still requires its employees to be tested for pot use). In one of the companion editorials, "Let States Decide on Marijuana," written by David Firestone, the Times argues that "consuming marijuana is not a fundamental right that should be imposed on the states by the federal government, in the manner of abortion rights, health insurance, or the freedom to marry a partner of either sex."

There's a whole lot of question-begging there. But let's just stipulate for the sake of argument that all of these things are unquestionably "fundamental rights that should be imposed on the states by the federal government." What about cigarettes? Or the use of highway funds to force a drinking age of 21 (and, for a time, a 55-mph speed limit)? When then-Attorney General Edwin Meese complained about federal bullying on such things, the Times screeched in 1986 that such a "horse-and-buggy view of the national union" would make it hard for people to "ever to take him seriously." Perhaps an apology is overdue?

I'm delighted the Times is capable of realizing the error of its ways; I just hope it doesn't stop with pot.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: cannabis; legalizazation; marijuana; newyorktimes; pot; statesrights; wod

1 posted on 08/06/2014 11:43:02 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These guys should be on a government watch list.

10th amendment and Fed Nullifiers. ..


2 posted on 08/06/2014 11:49:19 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Liberaltarians have always wanted it, just like they always gay marriage even though they didn’t admit it for a long time. They are all dopers anyway


3 posted on 08/06/2014 11:51:07 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
They are all dopers anyway

Joe Friday.

4 posted on 08/06/2014 11:53:27 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I assume they are still vehemently opposed to tobacco.


5 posted on 08/06/2014 11:56:47 AM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Drug use should be classified as disease or disorder in every sense of the word.


6 posted on 08/06/2014 11:58:14 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
One need not be a liberal to realize the War On (Some) Drugs has wasted billions with no effect, shredded the Fourth Amendment, and further emboldened the federal government at the expense of states' rights.

But hypocrites don't care about any of that so long as the demon weed keeps young women from having relations with negro jazz musicians. Or something.

Now let's go get a drink!

7 posted on 08/06/2014 12:02:05 PM PDT by gdani (Every day, your Govt surveils you more than the day before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

LOL.

Yea, conservatives were at the forefront of the pot legalization movement.

Does Jonah read what he writes?

NORML was founded in 1970, a couple of years before Milton made his comments about the WoD.


8 posted on 08/06/2014 12:04:58 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


"Those who say that we're in a time when there are no heroes,
they just don't know where to look."

~Ronald Reagan




please click the pic
donate today!
Help support Free Republic

9 posted on 08/06/2014 12:05:56 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Not all of them. See Daniel J. Mitchell's column from yesterday

Libertarianism and Human Decency

10 posted on 08/06/2014 12:08:06 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What about cigarettes? Or the use of highway funds to force a drinking age of 21 (and, for a time, a 55-mph speed limit)?

...or motorcycle helmet laws.

11 posted on 08/06/2014 12:08:25 PM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

I’ll flush my blood pressure medicine as soon as I get home...


12 posted on 08/06/2014 12:09:38 PM PDT by WayneS (Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If we don’t take this power away from the Feds, then in a few years the Feds will turn around and and FORCE the states to accept legal pot. They will take the power to outlaw it out of the hands of the state. It will be legal everywhere just like abortion.


13 posted on 08/06/2014 12:17:30 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The NYTs is a state's rights supporter now? lol

This sounds more like a desperate grab at trying to keep the last few readers from fleeing a dying newspaper.


14 posted on 08/06/2014 12:18:01 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
Drug use should be classified as disease or disorder in every sense of the word.

Including the drugs alcohol and tobacco?

Once we've so classified it, what do we do about that?

15 posted on 08/07/2014 9:03:18 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

You forgot caffeine.


16 posted on 08/07/2014 9:06:50 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
You forgot caffeine.

So I did. Just goes to show how much psychotropic substances are part of the fabric of American life.

17 posted on 08/07/2014 10:23:23 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson