Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/28/2014 11:21:44 AM PDT by Alter Kaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Alter Kaker

I still don’t get how any state/government can redefine marriage.

Can they also redefine what a ‘week’ is?


29 posted on 07/28/2014 12:08:29 PM PDT by thatjoeguy (Every law passed is one person forcing their morals on someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

I’d imagine that if thousands upon thousands of same-sex couples were walking down the aisle, we would have heard about it by now. That all we hear is crickets chirping makes me think that it just isn’t happening.


30 posted on 07/28/2014 12:10:33 PM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker
Was this the judge?


31 posted on 07/28/2014 12:17:10 PM PDT by DannyTN (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

This goes back to the question I’ve asked for years now...

Who, in their right mind, would even want to be president and have to govern over this drain-circling country?


34 posted on 07/28/2014 12:24:01 PM PDT by ScottinVA (If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

So these judges have just reclassified the right to exercise deeply held religious beliefs as “inertia and apprehension”.


36 posted on 07/28/2014 12:52:04 PM PDT by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker
However, inertia and apprehension are not legitimate bases for denying same-sex couples due process and equal protection of the laws.”

All the wisdom of the ages on the subject of marriage, family and the rearing of children is reduced to "inertia and apprehension." There is NO HOPE AT ALL for this country. None.

38 posted on 07/28/2014 1:37:14 PM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

This is all about judges who have bought the myth of “born that way” to justify sexual deviance.

How many of these “pillars of virtue” are just looking to justify hedonism to cover their own indiscretions? (cheating on their wives, husbands, etc.)


40 posted on 07/28/2014 1:43:29 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

When will a state secede? The 10th amendment is being stomped on.


41 posted on 07/28/2014 2:15:21 PM PDT by VerySadAmerican (Liberals were raised by women or wimps. And they're all stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

The constitution does not define marriage. A state could pass a law declaring it to be ilegal to marry a man to a animal and eventually some judge would strike it down.


45 posted on 07/28/2014 3:07:28 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

The coprophiliacs and lesbians win again.


55 posted on 07/28/2014 5:42:28 PM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker
Score another one for
60 posted on 07/28/2014 6:12:54 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker
God doesn't recognize it.

 

Catechism of the Catholic Church

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.


65 posted on 07/28/2014 7:12:32 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

Genesis 1

English Standard Version (ESV)

26 Then God said, “Let us make man[h] in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

27 So God created man in his own image,
    in the image of God he created him;
    male and female he created them.

28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 29 And God said, “Behold, I have given you every plant yielding seed that is on the face of all the earth, and every tree with seed in its fruit. You shall have them for food. 30 And to every beast of the earth and to every bird of the heavens and to everything that creeps on the earth, everything that has the breath of life, I have given every green plant for food.” And it was so. 31 And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.


66 posted on 07/28/2014 7:16:10 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

The ridiculous part of this is that these courts have invented a legal entity, the “couple,” which has its own rights, despite not having been defined in law.


70 posted on 07/28/2014 8:04:35 PM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

these kind of two judges don’t go by the constitution , but instead are driven by politics.


72 posted on 07/28/2014 8:18:52 PM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

Just what part of the Constitution discuses sodomy?


76 posted on 07/28/2014 8:55:49 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

God knows the names of both of those judges, and the names of all the judges who’re shaking their fists in His face. He is not mocked.


84 posted on 07/29/2014 5:00:03 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

“equal protection of the laws”

A key phrase and will allow any other kind of marriage despite being false.

Any man can marry any woman, any woman can marry any man. That is equal.

With this interpretation bigamy, poly, incestuous, and any other kind of ‘marriage’ will be legal.


88 posted on 07/29/2014 5:56:13 AM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

Between the invasion taking place as we speak and the courts we are finished. Does anyone really see things improving? Our side is quickly becoming the minority and with minority status comes oblivion. Unless, of course, you are the right kind of minority.


95 posted on 07/29/2014 7:57:10 AM PDT by animal172 (Calling Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alter Kaker

Meanwhile, other folks are getting awards for what they call “gospel music” saying they Love Jesus and yet voting Democrat.

They all are walking around as if they have been given a free pass, no conscience at all for the votes they make as Democrats...and People give me a hard time when I say the term “Christian Democrat” is a oxymoron

Where are the Christian leaders? Where were they starting in the late 60`s? Why didn`t they come out and say, if you call yourself a friend of Jesus you can not vote for pro choice/pro abortion candidates

Where are they now? Franklin Graham I guess would be one of the few on the right side, Tony Perkins, Dr Dobson

Is there anybody from the Catholic Church, I dont think so

It` long past the time for leaders to step up and say, Christians cant vote Democrat, or moderate Republican for that matter


97 posted on 07/29/2014 1:00:12 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge (Sarah Palin 2016 OR BUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson