Pat Buchanan also says “Wait” on any impeachment.
Why change the argument when you are winning?
Boehner’s right on this one.
Stopped clock syndrome.
Why change the argument when you are winning?
True. I say let liberalism be exposed for the BS that it is.
Because when the argument (and its handling) get taken out the hands of the second-tier appeasing politicians and their book-writing, book-hawking pundits (Buchannan) and put into the hands of the citizens, their power and access to more feathers for their beds decreases.
It is ALL about power, influence, attention and control they can exert - even if it is only second-tier.
They’ll tread over your bare skull to get to where they are going - don’t you believe otherwise.
Time if of the essence... can’t WAIT.
Every hour of every day Americans are being betrayed, American allies are under attack, and American national sovereignty is being compromised.
Wait? NOT!!
Agree.
But... was useful that Palin go the “I word” out there. Now that’s the debate.
If the purpose of impeachment is to convict there is not point doing it until the Senate is 60 in our hands. Even then it is necessary to have a 60
5 majority strongly supportive4 of removing O from office. As a matter of p[rinciple Sarah is absolutely correct. Obama is substantially in violation of his Constitutional authority. As a political matter impeachment will only slander O and give the Democrats one more bludgeoning tool.
Rather than impeachment Obama should be tried by a military tribunal as a combatant enemy. That would make sense.
Boehner is a looser. Boehner has allowed Obama to run roughshod over America for the past 5 years and now he is an expert?
PLEASE.
As for Buchanan, who elected him to ANYTHING - EVER??
I agree with Buchanan. Personally I say pass on impeachment and wait til it gets bad enough to just skip to removal and incarceration. That’s prolly only mos away anyhoo.