[Alberta's Child]

There was a pretty thorough analysis of TWA Flight 800 done on FreeRepublic a while back. The strongest case was made to support the theory that IF the aircraft was brought down by a missile, it was most likely an errant missile fired by a U.S. naval vessel (or a naval vessel of another NATO country, which would offer a stronger explanation about the need to cover it up) conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night.

[RayChuang88]

The reason why I mentioned the Russian 9K33 system was the fact the Russians during the Soviet era supplied a LOT of complete 9K33 systems to a number of Middle Eastern client states--especially Syria and Iraq. The terrorists could have quietly taken enough hardware from a Syrian or Iraqi arms depot to build the jury-rigged system I described.

[nuconvert]

“it was most likely an errant missile fired by a U.S. naval vessel (or a naval vessel of another NATO country, which would offer a stronger explanation about the need to cover it up) conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night.

Seeing how long ago it was, many sailors would have retired or left by now. It seems like someone would have either leaked info or come forward.

[lakecumberlandvet]

IF the US Navy had been involved in the downing of TWA 800 the Clintons would have eagerly used the incident to further denigrate the military. There would have been no coverup. It was undoubtedly a terrorist act most likely executed by the Iranians.

[JimRed]

...it was most likely an errant missile fired by a U.S. naval vessel (or a naval vessel of another NATO country, which would offer a stronger explanation about the need to cover it up) conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night. But there was not a single God fearing, Christian sailor aboard or in a staff position directing the operation who would have exposed the lies?

[JimRed]

...it was most likely an errant missile fired by a U.S. naval vessel (or a naval vessel of another NATO country, which would offer a stronger explanation about the need to cover it up) conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night.

But there was not a single God fearing, Christian sailor aboard or in a staff position directing the operation who would have exposed the lies?

Repaired.

[Lower Deck]

There was a pretty thorough analysis of TWA Flight 800 done on FreeRepublic a while back. The strongest case was made to support the theory that IF the aircraft was brought down by a missile, it was most likely an errant missile fired by a U.S. naval vessel (or a naval vessel of another NATO country, which would offer a stronger explanation about the need to cover it up) conducting exercises off the south shore of Long Island that night.

Missiles do not go off by accident, and the U.S. military is not in the habit of conducting live fire exercises anywhere near civilian air or sea traffic. And when they do conduct those kinds of exercises the file notices to airmen far in advance warning that the exercises are occuring and where.