Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FCC eyes changes to online video clips, businesses say don't 'underestimate the difficulty’
FOX News ^ | July 5 2014 | Joseph Weber

Posted on 07/05/2014 11:42:37 AM PDT by PoloSec

The Obama administration is set to decide next week on whether online video clips must include closed captioning -- a rule that if approved would help hearing-impaired viewers but could prove costly and time-consuming for businesses.

The five-member Federal Communications Commission will vote Friday on the proposed rule change, which will apply specifically to clips that have already appeared on TV with captions and would follow a similar, 2012 rule on full-length videos.

Such a change is supported by commission Chairman Tom Wheeler, who since being sworn in six months ago has made clear his keen interest in hearing-impaired issues.

“The commission previously adopted closed-captioning requirements for full-length video programming online,” he said last month. “I proposed … we go further and require captioning for video clips that end up on the Internet. Those who hear with their eyes should not be disadvantaged in their ability to access video information on the Internet.”

The change also has support from Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Ed Markey, who as a House member sponsored the 2010 Twenty-First Century Communication and Video Act, under which closed-captioning changes are being made.

A Markey spokeswoman said Wednesday that the senator hopes the commission approves the rule change, which would impact an estimated 36 million Americans who are either deaf or have hearing disabilities.

However, businesses and their Washington advocates are concerned about the cost of the proposed changes and how quickly the FCC will require the clips be added to the videos.

In fact, high-ranking members of the National Association of Broadcasters met June 30 with two members of Wheeler’s legal team to discuss such issues, according to a letter obtained by FoxNews.com.

The association expressed its willingness to work with the FCC on the issues but urged the agency to consider the “many steps” required to

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fcc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: PoloSec

Well, if Ed Markey is for it! Say no more!
Next, Braille Television for the Blind.


21 posted on 07/05/2014 12:49:37 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Just explain to them that close captioning a video clip is even more complicated than restoring email from a backup.


22 posted on 07/05/2014 12:56:53 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

“The Obama administration is set to decide next week on whether online video clips must include closed captioning — a rule that if approved would help hearing-impaired viewers but could prove costly and time-consuming for businesses.”

That is a wonderful idea! Perhaps add brail and a ‘seeing eye’ dog that could prance across the screen for the blind to follow along./sarc.

Another option would be to have the sound go up really freaking loud?


23 posted on 07/05/2014 1:01:23 PM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

I agree. It’s “for the deaf and hearing impaired” is just an excuse to get a foot in the door to regulating broader content. The aim of the FCC is to control the internet.


24 posted on 07/05/2014 1:11:51 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

We cannot have freedom with oppression like this. The hearing impaired are not watching videos for their audio content anyway.


25 posted on 07/05/2014 1:21:51 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

No jurisdiction and a blatant power grab to remain empowered.

It’s like when the US Post Office was looking at giving everyone in America an email address so they could hand deliver spam email messages to elderly people.

And Biden (or was it Reid or someone else who) defended the junk mail that is already delivered to old people “it’s the only contact with the outside world many of them have!”.


26 posted on 07/05/2014 1:36:16 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

This can be handled via electronic speech to text conversion. May not be perfect but that is what makes sense in this case. MSM and various outlets should be encouraged to do this voluntarily. The technology already exists. Government intervention is not needed. Much ado about nothing.


27 posted on 07/05/2014 2:44:55 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

This is a back door to censorship. The Globalisy want to control the Internet because it’s exposing them. This is simply a back door way where the Feds can ban 1000s of videos that they do not want known.

The FCC has no juristriction. Anyone that falls for this rubbish is extremely ignorant and highly gullible.


28 posted on 07/05/2014 6:50:46 PM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson