Posted on 07/05/2014 8:38:38 AM PDT by madprof98
BJ Barone and Frankie Nelson recently became dads to a beautiful baby named Milo, and Canadian photographer Lindsay Foster captured the first time they held their newborn son.
Heartstrings of people all over the world were tugged by these amazing, intimate moments, and the photos have since become viral.
(Excerpt) Read more at elitedaily.com ...
Can you imagine being raised without a FEMALE mother? I cannot, and NEVER WILL - I know what I am ready to die for in this earthly life. When we are banned from speaking ill of this type of perversion I am just as ready to die as when they come for my weapons.
I read a few of them, which is why I posted the article here. I just wanted to be sure there were still a few people on earth who would find this scene dismaying. But I believe we are a relatively small number these days. In fact, it seems to me that most WOMEN actually think these naked guys with "their" baby boy are candidates for Parents of the Year.
Just like the other “model parent” homosexuals showcased by the media, there is a great likelihood that these two will later be discovered for sexually abusing their “son”.
Even if one of them is the sperm donor/vendor.
She is complicit in denying her child the right to his own mother and his natural kin: the first right a child has after the right to life itself.
And on a more heart-felt level: isn't the anxiety going to torment her for the rest of her life? What th' hell does she think she's doing?
When the two guys break up, is she going to reappear to reclaim the child?
I suppose they'll go on to adopt a second child --- like Elton John and Whazzisname --- so they can each have one.
In my opinion, it is sickening, not incredible.
The “birth mother” is not even one person. Eggs for one donor are fertilized and then carried by a different surrogate. Just to make sure nobody is too attached to this little boy. Except, of course, his “daddies.”
Sorry guys,,this may get me kicked off Free Republic but I don’t share the views of most posted here.
It can never be a bad thing if a child is wanted. Ever. There are plenty of hetero couples that have royally screwed up their children, harmed them or even killed them. I’ll leave the rest for God to judge.
I’m sure the tolerance flames will be burning me alive any minute now.
I was raised most of my life without my mom, because of her early death. It happens to a lot of people. It’s sad,,it can be tragic if you let it define you as a person,,,but it doesn’t have to be.
Probably just got done trying to spawn a fecal child.
Don-o and I have a younger son who is adopted, as many FReepers know. This was because he had no mama or papa who wanted him, no family member who wanted him, and we tried, as best we could, to fill his need for a mama and a papa. It was responding to a known hurt, a known wound, a known deprivation that he had suffered.
But this artificial insemination - IVF - surrogate thing means deliberately wounding the child. Deliberately creating him to be bereft of his natural mother and a natural family. Two homosexual males plunk down the money and walk off with a newborn baby.
It's buying products and services, it's enterprise, the Omnicompetent Free Market System. Buy and sell! Buy and sell! Anyone, everyone, people, places, things! Godless capitalism, like godless communism, both destined for destruction on the Day of the Lord.
I don’t think any kidnapper could force a worse life upon this child.
In fact, it seems to me that most WOMEN actually think these naked guys with “their” baby boy are candidates for Parents of the Year.
...not the least bit surprising, since women always have, and always shall be, easily manipulated by heartstring tugging...
...and considering the immense power that women have been accorded in shaping the cultural ethos, the future will be even more, well, uncertain...
More like gag reflex, this is disgusting because it totally inverts God’s plan for a family. He will not be mocked. May these two men get saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth (in Christ), and this person eventually be raised in a Christ honoring environment!
Different to lose a parent to a death and to be “manufactured” in a lab from the genetic material of people who were paid for that purpose. Way different.
What th’ hell does she think she’s doing?
...her job...as she probably received a handsome remuneration for services rendered...
Don-o and I have a younger son who is adopted, as many FReepers know. This was because he had no mama or papa who wanted him, no family member who wanted him, and we tried, as best we could, to fill his need for a mama and a papa. It was responding to a known hurt, a known wound, a known deprivation that he had suffered.
But this artificial insemination - IVF - surrogate thing means deliberately wounding the child. Deliberately creating him to be bereft of his natural mother and a natural family. Two homosexual males plunk down the money and walk off with a newborn baby.
It's buying products and services, it's enterprise, it's human trafficking, it's the Omnicompetent Free Market System. Buy and sell! Buy and sell! Anyone, everyone, slaves, braceros, babies! Godless capitalism, like godless communism, both destined for destruction on the Day of the Lord.
She’s an accessory to this abomination.
Unlike Liberals we tolerate dissenting views (even when we disagree, and I do with your point), so you shall not be attacked at least by most.
I disagree because this is not the natural plan that God had for the family. (Can he use this, and what happens in this person’s life-even being raised by homosexual “dads” (neither are since neither had intercourse for this baby to be created), sure God can and does care about this person, but they’ll be saved inspite of their circumstances not because of them, because they’re not God honoring.
-JS
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.