Posted on 07/05/2014 8:38:38 AM PDT by madprof98
BJ Barone and Frankie Nelson recently became dads to a beautiful baby named Milo, and Canadian photographer Lindsay Foster captured the first time they held their newborn son.
Heartstrings of people all over the world were tugged by these amazing, intimate moments, and the photos have since become viral.
(Excerpt) Read more at elitedaily.com ...
Just a guess, but it appears the baby was just born and they are in a hospital room. The shirtless “mother” (homo) is doing what new mothers do, hold the baby to their chest and start bonding/imprinting with the baby.
Homo sickness on full display.
OK, I looked. But then I cleared my computer history.
Would you say the same for a pedophile loving a child?
Would you say the same for a pedophile loving a child?
Just testing. Having problem reaching FR.
Loud and clear.
Next will be pedophiles hugging bareskinned chests with newborns and calling it "love"
Next will be pedophiles hugging bareskinned chests with newborns and calling it "love"
Why are the two fathers bare chested in the delivery room? Those pics are posed and look sexual with a newborn. Sick.
This is evolution at work.
It was bound to happen.
Two people of the same sex being able to conceive, and have a child.
We’ll be getting the research and studies which show proof of that evolution...
sometime in the future.
I can’t wait.
We’re going to see Constitutional lawlessness beyond belief, now that he knows he can get away with it. And the endless, bankrupting stream of EOs allowing rogue agencies to run roughshod over America, will be astounding. He has nothing to lose in implementing the Marxist/fascist/commie/socialist/homo agendas. Get ready; it’s going to get real ‘bumpy’.
I posted the same thing here in early-2012, after I closed my Farm Business on 11/1/11, based upon research and a gut feeling. (I don’t know how to go back that far in Pings to find those posts.)
Yes, it does. And there are many stories about supposedly model homosexual “parents” who are doing unspeakable things to these poor children. One Australian “couple” was pimping out their boy toddler to other men, as well as molesting him themselves.
I just wonder how much longer God will put up with this evil.
Likely the guy with the taunt teared up face is the “female†impersonator of these two...they tend to have exaggerated emotions. Either way this is not a celebration of this dear child’s birth.....it’s an in your face show of two sexual perverts holding a child that a mother has abandoned to them...and that’s all it is.
“They strut their evil before you”.....
Likely the guy with the taunt teared up face is the “female†impersonator of these two...they tend to have exaggerated emotions. Either way this is not a celebration of this dear child’s birth.....it’s an in your face show of two sexual perverts holding a child that a mother has abandoned to them...and that’s all it is.
“They strut their evil before you”.....
We are witnessing the “long suffering” of God toward this evil generation.....but I fear, for others, that things are escalating and being set up for that day when HE says ..’Enough’!
The best agitprop is in the comments. Every heterosexual family was totally dysfunctional, uncaring fathers who beat their mothers, never took the kids to the park, horrible for the children, if only the distressed writer could have had gay parents they would have been so well-adjusted!
That is the definition of Straw-Man!
Anyone who commented against, was labelled a hater and a sicko.
What a load of garbage!
It is SO out of control. It just feels so diseased and, quite honestly, evilly inspired that it makes one just want to build an entirely insular world where they can block it all out and disengage.
Not long ago there was a time this child would have been “protected” from men such as this....now it’s celebrated.
Won’t be long til all forms of perversion will be tolerated and then accepted as a lovely ‘thing’ among the same perverted and twisted individuals we see outnumbering us who oppose this.
First, nobody's blaming or being "judgmental" toward the child. The child is innocent, and also ignorant, and will bond somehow with anybody who holds and feeds him, whether it's mom, coyote, cousin, kidnapper, or Comrade Katya at the Detsky Dom (as was the case with our adopted son from Russia.)
Any child will respond to care, even veterinary care. But a broken, full-orphan or half-orphan situation should not be a pre-planned part of the deal. No one should sign onto a scheme to conceive by contract, carry without kinship and hand over for cash. This should not be imposed on any child by choice.
When I say "broken" I mean intentionally ripped away from the organic bonds which are rooted in our human nature. There is a physical/psychological unity between a pair-bonding man and woman, especially after their union has produced a child. There is a physical/psychological unity between a mother an an infant: they bond prenatally, and go on provoking physical responses in each other, years after the birth.
Recently discovered: a process known as "microchimerism" (LINK), where some of the the unborn babies' stem cells actually migrate through the placenta and his cells permanently colonize his mother's body. Nobody knows the full medical implications of this yet, but it seems there is a permanent, demonstrable "co-sharing" of cells that goes on, possibly instinctively sensitizing mother and baby to each other.
If you believe in evolution, this is an excellently balanced naturally-selected trait that has been refined for 1.75 million years to maximize the survival of the species. If you are a creationist, this is a supreme example of Intelligent Design.
Of course, you can raise a child without all these intricate interwoven safety features. But it would be wrong to deliberately, with full intention, make a PLAN to deprive him of them from the git-go.
Therein is the violation of his rights. That he was stripped out of his natural kinship environment, not by chance but by choice.
The homosexual men CREATED a warped plan to get them a baby. They MADE that child motherless; they signed a contract that will KEEP him motherless; they'd get a court order to keep the mother away by force of law, if need be; they paid the money and, via a tech team and a rented woman, they concocted themselves a baby boy.
All driven by their wants, not his needs.
Gushy nonsense. No wonder the American family is crumbling, despite all the “skin to skin” connections the trendy set may make.
...please read the response I made to you in #73, and then read the one you responded to here, and you will see what I meant...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.