Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/03/2014 4:29:03 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Dr. Keating...Do you still beat your wife?”


30 posted on 07/03/2014 5:19:55 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Tell ya what, Keating...

How about you prove to the world that climate change/global warming/whatever the flavor of the day name it is now HAS NOT made those pushing it on everyone else STEENKING FREAKING RICH?


31 posted on 07/03/2014 5:22:03 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Uninstall Fascist Firefox. Get Pale Moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Prove a negative? Disprove?

That assumes that its been proved.

This bet is as real as Bohners phony lawsuit, another stunt.


32 posted on 07/03/2014 5:22:37 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I guess you deniers haven’t been in Vegas the last couple of days.....


33 posted on 07/03/2014 5:24:12 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism" Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LkMweOVOOI “Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax”

Testimony before Senate committee

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppQl6KYyMqA “Lord Monckton on Climate Change”


34 posted on 07/03/2014 5:26:24 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ( "For those who have fought for it, Life bears a savor the protected will never know")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

As a scientist, he should know better. You can neither prove nor disprove a theory; you can only present evidence that either converges or diverges with the theory. There is no such thing as “settled science”; there is only what is the best explanation for the available evidence today, with the perpetual possibility that later evidence will replace the explanation with one that better explains the later evidence.


35 posted on 07/03/2014 5:28:41 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If he means global warming then there is more than enough data this it has been cooling. Maybe Piers Corbyn will take his challenge!


36 posted on 07/03/2014 5:29:16 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The climate changes thisa way and thata way so you’ll never win.


37 posted on 07/03/2014 5:30:09 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

He has proven only one thing: that he is not a scientist.

It is impossible to “prove” anything in nature. All we can do is discover, and we must do that honestly to be effective (this is the scientific method).

The real problem is that people accept such nonsense as logic.


39 posted on 07/03/2014 5:32:52 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

40 posted on 07/03/2014 5:33:44 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

lol

so basically he is stating that he will pay $30,000 to anyone who can change his closed brainwashed mind?

lol

why would anyone bother?


44 posted on 07/03/2014 5:42:06 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

He should make his check out to Burt Rutan, who has already done that. In effect, he is betting on a game that is already over.


45 posted on 07/03/2014 5:46:40 AM PDT by Pecos (Kakocracy - killing the Constitution, one step at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I think it’s incumbent on the people seeking to imposes radical and disastrous measures down on us to prove THEIR case. Not the other way around.


46 posted on 07/03/2014 5:49:39 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Did he ever think of proving it? Or debating it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k


48 posted on 07/03/2014 5:53:15 AM PDT by Vision (Living in beauty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Well, we have Einstein’s equation to cheat off of.

Climate Change.....hmmmmm......we’ll call that C

Now, C has to equal something. Einstein had a constant. What do we have that is constant? Oh....Obama is constantly full of s**t. That sentence is too long, so we have to shrink it to one letter. Let’s see.......one Obama full of s**t can be called an Obamit. That can be shortened to an O. That’s pretty good. Now, we need another letter. Einstein had mass....what can we use?
Money! There’s the answer! We’ll use an M to stand for money. Now we have the equation!
I hereby call this blueunicorn6’s Theory Of Relativescomingtodinner....

C = MO squared

Where’s my money?


49 posted on 07/03/2014 6:01:47 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

$30K? That’s chicken feed?

Think of the billions we’ve paid these morons to show that man made global warming is real and they still haven’t done it.


50 posted on 07/03/2014 6:05:54 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
OK. How about $30,000 to prove UFOs do or don't exist? $30,000 to prove bigfoot does or does not exist?

One can, if reliable data is available (a significant if) prove that climate change may or may not be occurring, but to prove an anthropomorphic component is not much different a task than the UFO challenge.

52 posted on 07/03/2014 6:20:33 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Too many nutty professors are employed by nutty tax-supported governments, both state and national....and this guy is living proof on both levels.

I'll give you $30,000 to prove me wrong.

Leni

53 posted on 07/03/2014 6:28:22 AM PDT by MinuteGal (The Infernal Revenue Service - forever to be known as the BS-IRS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Man made global warming has already been PROVEN to be a hoax. Read the many thousands of emails released by the East Anglia University hackers. It clearly shows collusion between the “scientist” and climate change advocates (Especially Michael Mann of Penn State hockey stick infamy). The cooked the books to get the results they wanted. IT IS ALL A HUGE STINKING LIE!


54 posted on 07/03/2014 6:41:11 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rather, they should be required to prove climate change is caused by man. Everyone knows the climate changes. Nothing natural is static.
55 posted on 07/03/2014 7:01:31 AM PDT by zeugma (It is time for us to start playing cowboys and muslims for real now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson