This sounds fishy. I’m withholding judgement.
Democrats can’t win this fair and square, so they have every incentive to sow dissension in GOP ranks and the public at large so that so many people get turned off by the whole thing that Childers wins by default.
What advantage does this “Reverend” have in implicating himself in the vote buying?
He says he had a change of heart when he looked at what McDaniel actually stood for. He’s voted Republican in the past. I don’t care what the circumstances or motivations are. If it can force a second election, I’m for it.
Cochran has ZERO support from me
It was clear this sort of thing was going on and it’s good that it is getting out.
The Democrats don't have to sow anything. The GOPe has been front and center in this thing saying "we don't care if your guy won, shut up and vote for our hand picked senile old coot."
What advantage does this “Reverend” have in implicating himself in the vote buying?
GOOD QUESTION!
I wouldn’t put it past the Rats to be playing both sides.
Maybe Haley Barbour and the rest of Cochran’s people should of thought about those things before they decided to make their deal with the devil. Their pyrrhic victory may not be any kind of victory at all. Good-bye GOPe.
Democrats can’t win this fair and square, so they have every incentive to sow dissension in GOP ranks
That’s already been done...BY THE GOP!
given the cantor smear campaign he ran, and he lost and the gop-e is scared sh1tless from this,
it is not fishy at all to me.