FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
Posted on 06/27/2014 10:14:30 AM PDT by lilyramone
The Supreme Court ruling on Thursday that invalidated three appointments made by President Obama to the National Labor Relations Board has thrown hundreds of the board's decisions into question.
The board that rules on labor disputes is now scrambling to determine the impact of the high court decision. At issue is whether board decisions made when the now-invalid appointees were participating will have to be re-decided under the current NLRB.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Check out this statement from the White House.
Shut this unconstitutional communist board down!
I was wondering when the other shoe would drop on this.
I find this highly amusing.
bump!
was an order promulgated to have the illegal appointees refund their salaries and bonuses?
“How can we get around this ruling?”
True, but watch how the enemedia tries to spin it otherwise. This could very serious and far reaching consequences particularly if it is ever determined that BO was ineligible to be POTUS as well.
Everyone whom he nominated to any level of the federal courts would have to take a hike as well.
Great minds think a like and you beat me by less than one minute.
Lefties scrambling.
Need some popcorn.
I hope they film it and we get to see them all tumble out of a tiny car as they throw buckets filled with confetti and pretend like they're getting splashed with water.
As a side note about the NRLB mentioned in relalated threads, please consider the following. With the exception of the federal entities indicated by the Constitution’s Clauses 16 & 17 of Section 8 of Article I as examples, entities under the exclusive legislative control of Congress, the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate intrastate labor. Only the states, with their 10th Amendment-protected sovereign powers, can regulate intrastate labor issues, unless the states amend the Constitution to grant such power to the feds.
Also, consider that the Founding States had made the first numbered clauses in the Constitution, Sections 1-3 of Article I, to clarify that all federal legislative powers are vested in the elected members of Congress, not in the executive or judicial branches, or in non-elected bureaucrats like those running the NLRB and the EPA. So Congress has a constitutional monopoly on federal legislative / regulator powers whether it wants it or not imo. And by delegating federal regulatory powers to non-elected federal bureaucrats like the NLRB (and the EPA), Congress is wrongly protecting the abuse of federal legislative powers from the wrath of the voters in blatant defiance of Sections 1-3 referenced above. Otherwise, a president would probably never try such shenanigans in an election year.
So not only are the non-elected bureaucrats of the NLRB wrongly exercising federal regulatory powers, but the NLRB is regulating intrastate labor issues regardless that the states have never delegated to the feds, via the Constitution, the specific power to address such issues.
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
There is no way to recover from such a finding - imagine undoing EIGHT years of this a$$hat’s destruction of America!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.