And how long before this "state" gets nukes?
The Jihadi menace is being abetted by the Democrat Party.
If ISIS does succeed in forming a “state” it will be the nastiest state since Nazi Germany.
In a real way, Iraq is poland of September of 1939. But from what I’ve seen, these guys are far more ruthless than the Nazis were.
The current administration isn’t very worried. After all, they’re just poor, downtrodden, misunderstood practitioners of the religion of peace.
A great write - thanks for posting.
I would say that Bambi is whistling past the graveyard by describing this major Islamic incursion as a “sectarian conflict,” but that would mean I felt he was just naïve.
Truth to tell, he hates the US and has always supported the most radical form of Islam in any country where it appears, because he regards Islam as a vengeance on Europeans and Christians, whom he hates thanks to his imagined, hallucinatory relationship with his Marxist Muslim father.
No worries ..... ISIS is not bin Laden (he’s dead, you know) so they’re just “jayvee”. [/s]
From day one of his presidency, Trojan Horses Obama has consistently facilitated the outcomes for which his handlers installed him.
Wowzers! This article is a damming indictment of nobama.
Go read it. Spread it around.
A Somali Canadian fighting with Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)
http://youtu.be/UxdsnbwT0DQ
The way they’re going not long. Their star is rising and they’re becoming more than just a ragtag bunch of towelheads shooting AK’s into the air and are quickly evolving into a serious threat. Since we helped hatch this egg that worries me even more that it will come back to bite us.
The Jihadi Menace made itself known with the FIRST bombing of The World Trade Center in NYC.
Rarely has an administration so trumpeted its superior wisdom and strategic smarts;
leads directly to Part 2:
rarely has any American administration experienced so much ignominious failure, or had its ignorance and miscalculation so brutally exposed.
Those with any wisdom / experience (learned from) did not even need to know what the policies would be, to know the outcome.
The article asks some good questions:
How could the U.S. government have been caught napping by the rise of a new and hostile power in a region of vital concern? What warning signs were missed, what opportunities were lost—and why?
Indeed. 13 years after 911, this is a security failure so monumental that it is hard to comprehend. Ok, granted, we know Obama was off playing golf or, er, "whatever", instead of attending National Security meetings, but where the H. E. double L was everyone, or anyone, else? A bigger, badder, richer, and VERY effective "A.Q. Heavy" just came out of nowhere? No way.
Granted, some will say this is a part of an Obama agenda to wreck America, but, I don't think so. Obambi can't feign ignorance on this one: The responsibility here is just too direct, and too politically damaging, to be intentionally self-inflicted. "The One" can't afford to be totally discredited over 2 years before the end of his term. Sheer incompetence is a much more likely explanation.
(Ok, I would accept the possibility that ISIS / ISIL was planned / allowed, and simply "blew up" like a pulse thunderstorm MUCH faster than expected, but even that implies incompetence of the highest order...)
If Obama had any honor, or even a desire to rescue his own party from disaster, he would
A) Somehow dump Biden.
B) Name as VP some Lib / Dem who would actually demand to have competent people fighting the War on Terror. (Joe Lieberman?)
C) Then resign, himself.
Unfortunately, unlike, say, Napoleon after Waterloo, Obama likes being ruler too much...
BTTT!