Jason Hanna (L) And Joe Riggs (R) in a Fox 4 interview posted June 17, 2014.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: SeekAndFind
YOU CANNOT HAVE TWO FATHERS ON THE DAMN BIRTH CERTIFICATE! And why is it legal for a woman to surrogate for two deviants!?
2 posted on
06/20/2014 10:10:53 AM PDT by
Viennacon
To: SeekAndFind
their twin sons Someone needs to tell The Christian Post that a child cannot be the product of two men having sex. The child's father is one of them and its mother is the surrogate. Thus, there are no "two fathers" of this child.
3 posted on
06/20/2014 10:11:56 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: SeekAndFind
The connection between homosexuality and commercial baby-manufacture is very strong. People who approve the latter and object to the former should take note.
4 posted on
06/20/2014 10:12:15 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
("Cynicism is a far greater spiritual danger than naivete." ~ Stephen Webb)
To: SeekAndFind
Yeah, like Texas is supposed to recognize that some newborn baby came out of one of these two deviant freak’s disease-ridden anus?
5 posted on
06/20/2014 10:15:07 AM PDT by
greene66
To: SeekAndFind
While the fathers are petitioning to be placed on the birth certificates, conservative group Family Research Council has argued that the case should not serve as a “back-door” for redefining marriage.
_____________________________________________________
In first with “Never use that term in a thread like this”.
(Yeesh!)
6 posted on
06/20/2014 10:16:56 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: SeekAndFind
I usually support the FRC. They are almost always right. But this...
"Family Research Council supports the parental rights of anyone who is a biological parent, regardless of their marital or relationship status," Peter Sprigg, senior fellow at FRC, told The Christian Post in an email on Thursday.
This makes me go; "Huh??"
If you are gay, then yeah. Your parental rights SHOULD be called into question.
8 posted on
06/20/2014 10:21:28 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: SeekAndFind
Alternate headline “Texas Rejects Illogical Fantasy Of Two Males Creating A Child”
9 posted on
06/20/2014 10:23:50 AM PDT by
DwFry
(Baby Boomers Killed Western Civilization!)
To: SeekAndFind
The gay couple, legally married in Washington, D.C., last July, said they are worried if something were to happen to one of them and adoption was denied to the remaining partner. Then move back to Washington, D.C. to satisfy your perverted life.
GET THE HELL OUT OF TEXAS!
10 posted on
06/20/2014 10:25:30 AM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: SeekAndFind
While each man is the biological father of one of the children, they have not been placed on the birth certificates, and have not been allowed to co-adopt each other's biological child. Only the surrogate mother is on the certificates, but she is not their biological mother, since embryos were transferred to her. "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive..."
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
15 posted on
06/20/2014 10:38:57 AM PDT by
moovova
To: SeekAndFind
I am a Christian. I don’t believe in same-sex marriage. I don’t hate homosexuals. I believe that’s the stance of 99.9% of Christians. The title of this article is asking for trouble.
To: SeekAndFind
Imagine being the poor kid who has a mans name down as “Mother” (or “parnet 2” with no mother at all on his birth certificate.
Imagine the twisted selfish men who would do this to a child.
25 posted on
06/20/2014 10:49:57 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
To: SeekAndFind
“Denied legal recognition” of WHAT?
This article is gibberish.
28 posted on
06/20/2014 10:52:20 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
To: SeekAndFind
I feel sorry for the twins having to be born into that kind of mess. Prayers up.
34 posted on
06/20/2014 11:05:50 AM PDT by
dragonblustar
( Psalm 103, Psalm 37:7, Ephesians 6:12)
To: SeekAndFind
Beware. These poor children will never be normal.
To: SeekAndFind
Whatever else these characters might be, they are not “fathers.”
To: SeekAndFind
While each man is the biological father of one of the children, they have not been placed on the birth certificates, and have not been allowed to co-adopt each other's biological child. Only the surrogate mother is on the certificates, but she is not their biological mother, since embryos were transferred to her. Doing this to a child is evil, pure evil. The kids should be taken away from these vile men and placed with a real family.
To: SeekAndFind
They create an unconscionable, untenable situation with a helpless child, and then complain that the situation is unconscionable and untenable.
45 posted on
06/20/2014 2:14:14 PM PDT by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: SeekAndFind
I have big doubts about whether this website can be considered “Christian” to tell the truth, possibly wolf in sheeps clothing
53 posted on
06/20/2014 3:28:37 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson