[Opinionated Blowhard]

their twin sons

Someone needs to tell The Christian Post that a child cannot be the product of two men having sex. The child's father is one of them and its mother is the surrogate. Thus, there are no "two fathers" of this child.

[defconw]

Plus they are not twins, as twins have the same DNA. You know these people need to stop. This is just ridiculous. They don’t want those kids, they really don’t it’s all about getting attention.

[Jim from C-Town]

Apparently the surrogate is NOT the biological mother as she did not supply the eggs for the child. She was simply the incubator. Who knows where they got the eggs. Perhaps on sale at the piggly wiggly?

[CharlesWayneCT]

I thought it was interesting that the surrogate was on the BC, given she isn’t biologically involved, and had no interest in the children.

Of course, each parent could have already had their names on the certificate of their child. They REFUSE to do that, because then it would just be an unrelated guy asking to be on the BC, and that would be stupid.

By refusing to put their own names on their own child’s certificates, they can pretend they are being “denied” access to their children.

[NetAddicted]

The article said they were both genetic fathers.