Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Gay Fathers Denied Legal Recognition of Twin Sons Born Through Surrogate
Christian Post ^ | 06/20/2014 | Stoyan Zaimov

Posted on 06/20/2014 10:09:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
Jason Hanna (L) And Joe Riggs (R) in a Fox 4 interview posted June 17, 2014.
1 posted on 06/20/2014 10:09:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

YOU CANNOT HAVE TWO FATHERS ON THE DAMN BIRTH CERTIFICATE! And why is it legal for a woman to surrogate for two deviants!?


2 posted on 06/20/2014 10:10:53 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
their twin sons

Someone needs to tell The Christian Post that a child cannot be the product of two men having sex. The child's father is one of them and its mother is the surrogate. Thus, there are no "two fathers" of this child.

3 posted on 06/20/2014 10:11:56 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The connection between homosexuality and commercial baby-manufacture is very strong. People who approve the latter and object to the former should take note.


4 posted on 06/20/2014 10:12:15 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Cynicism is a far greater spiritual danger than naivete." ~ Stephen Webb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, like Texas is supposed to recognize that some newborn baby came out of one of these two deviant freak’s disease-ridden anus?


5 posted on 06/20/2014 10:15:07 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While the fathers are petitioning to be placed on the birth certificates, conservative group Family Research Council has argued that the case should not serve as a “back-door” for redefining marriage.

_____________________________________________________

In first with “Never use that term in a thread like this”.

(Yeesh!)


6 posted on 06/20/2014 10:16:56 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Plus they are not twins, as twins have the same DNA. You know these people need to stop. This is just ridiculous. They don’t want those kids, they really don’t it’s all about getting attention.


7 posted on 06/20/2014 10:18:14 AM PDT by defconw (LUTFA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I usually support the FRC. They are almost always right. But this...
"Family Research Council supports the parental rights of anyone who is a biological parent, regardless of their marital or relationship status," Peter Sprigg, senior fellow at FRC, told The Christian Post in an email on Thursday.
This makes me go; "Huh??"

If you are gay, then yeah. Your parental rights SHOULD be called into question.

8 posted on 06/20/2014 10:21:28 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Alternate headline “Texas Rejects Illogical Fantasy Of Two Males Creating A Child”


9 posted on 06/20/2014 10:23:50 AM PDT by DwFry (Baby Boomers Killed Western Civilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The gay couple, legally married in Washington, D.C., last July, said they are worried if something were to happen to one of them and adoption was denied to the remaining partner.

Then move back to Washington, D.C. to satisfy your perverted life.
GET THE HELL OUT OF TEXAS!

10 posted on 06/20/2014 10:25:30 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DwFry; All

RE: Alternate headline “Texas Rejects Illogical Fantasy Of Two Males Creating A Child”

How many of you are willing to bet that the Federal Courts will eventually step in and reverse this decision?


11 posted on 06/20/2014 10:27:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
While each man is the biological father of one of the children, they have not been placed on the birth certificates, and have not been allowed to co-adopt each other's biological child. Only the surrogate mother is on the certificates, but she is not their biological mother, since embryos were transferred to her.

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive..."

12 posted on 06/20/2014 10:28:07 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

GREAT !!!!


13 posted on 06/20/2014 10:33:47 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
Apparently the surrogate is NOT the biological mother as she did not supply the eggs for the child. She was simply the incubator. Who knows where they got the eggs. Perhaps on sale at the piggly wiggly?
14 posted on 06/20/2014 10:35:54 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“back-door”

Oh, no..


15 posted on 06/20/2014 10:38:57 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: defconw

They are fraternal twins from what I can tell. They each had an embryo they fertilized implanted in the woman. The woman was NOT the egg donor, only the incubator.

I know. you need a flow chart to keep up with the deviancy. It gives me a headache.


16 posted on 06/20/2014 10:39:03 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town

Thanks for explaining. I know what you mean about the headache!


17 posted on 06/20/2014 10:41:34 AM PDT by defconw (LUTFA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: defconw

Oh, they want them. They want them at about 13-18 years of age in order to have easy access to young kids. Don’t think otherwise. Scratch a Homo find a ephebophile!

This is a NORM in the Homosexual community.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia


18 posted on 06/20/2014 10:41:49 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Didn’t California allow three parents on a birth certificate?


19 posted on 06/20/2014 10:42:11 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

It was Florida.


20 posted on 06/20/2014 10:44:12 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson