Skip to comments.
Texas Gay Fathers Denied Legal Recognition of Twin Sons Born Through Surrogate
Christian Post ^
| 06/20/2014
| Stoyan Zaimov
Posted on 06/20/2014 10:09:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Jason Hanna (L) And Joe Riggs (R) in a Fox 4 interview posted June 17, 2014.
To: SeekAndFind
YOU CANNOT HAVE TWO FATHERS ON THE DAMN BIRTH CERTIFICATE! And why is it legal for a woman to surrogate for two deviants!?
2
posted on
06/20/2014 10:10:53 AM PDT
by
Viennacon
To: SeekAndFind
their twin sons Someone needs to tell The Christian Post that a child cannot be the product of two men having sex. The child's father is one of them and its mother is the surrogate. Thus, there are no "two fathers" of this child.
3
posted on
06/20/2014 10:11:56 AM PDT
by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: SeekAndFind
The connection between homosexuality and commercial baby-manufacture is very strong. People who approve the latter and object to the former should take note.
4
posted on
06/20/2014 10:12:15 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("Cynicism is a far greater spiritual danger than naivete." ~ Stephen Webb)
To: SeekAndFind
Yeah, like Texas is supposed to recognize that some newborn baby came out of one of these two deviant freak’s disease-ridden anus?
5
posted on
06/20/2014 10:15:07 AM PDT
by
greene66
To: SeekAndFind
While the fathers are petitioning to be placed on the birth certificates, conservative group Family Research Council has argued that the case should not serve as a “back-door” for redefining marriage.
_____________________________________________________
In first with “Never use that term in a thread like this”.
(Yeesh!)
6
posted on
06/20/2014 10:16:56 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Plus they are not twins, as twins have the same DNA. You know these people need to stop. This is just ridiculous. They don’t want those kids, they really don’t it’s all about getting attention.
7
posted on
06/20/2014 10:18:14 AM PDT
by
defconw
(LUTFA!)
To: SeekAndFind
I usually support the FRC. They are almost always right. But this...
"Family Research Council supports the parental rights of anyone who is a biological parent, regardless of their marital or relationship status," Peter Sprigg, senior fellow at FRC, told The Christian Post in an email on Thursday.
This makes me go; "Huh??"
If you are gay, then yeah. Your parental rights SHOULD be called into question.
8
posted on
06/20/2014 10:21:28 AM PDT
by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: SeekAndFind
Alternate headline “Texas Rejects Illogical Fantasy Of Two Males Creating A Child”
9
posted on
06/20/2014 10:23:50 AM PDT
by
DwFry
(Baby Boomers Killed Western Civilization!)
To: SeekAndFind
The gay couple, legally married in Washington, D.C., last July, said they are worried if something were to happen to one of them and adoption was denied to the remaining partner. Then move back to Washington, D.C. to satisfy your perverted life.
GET THE HELL OUT OF TEXAS!
10
posted on
06/20/2014 10:25:30 AM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: DwFry; All
RE: Alternate headline Texas Rejects Illogical Fantasy Of Two Males Creating A Child
How many of you are willing to bet that the Federal Courts will eventually step in and reverse this decision?
To: SeekAndFind
While each man is the biological father of one of the children, they have not been placed on the birth certificates, and have not been allowed to co-adopt each other's biological child. Only the surrogate mother is on the certificates, but she is not their biological mother, since embryos were transferred to her. "Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive..."
To: SeekAndFind
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Apparently the surrogate is NOT the biological mother as she did not supply the eggs for the child. She was simply the incubator. Who knows where they got the eggs. Perhaps on sale at the piggly wiggly?
14
posted on
06/20/2014 10:35:54 AM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: SeekAndFind
15
posted on
06/20/2014 10:38:57 AM PDT
by
moovova
To: defconw
They are fraternal twins from what I can tell. They each had an embryo they fertilized implanted in the woman. The woman was NOT the egg donor, only the incubator.
I know. you need a flow chart to keep up with the deviancy. It gives me a headache.
16
posted on
06/20/2014 10:39:03 AM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Jim from C-Town
Thanks for explaining. I know what you mean about the headache!
17
posted on
06/20/2014 10:41:34 AM PDT
by
defconw
(LUTFA!)
To: defconw
Oh, they want them. They want them at about 13-18 years of age in order to have easy access to young kids. Don’t think otherwise. Scratch a Homo find a ephebophile!
This is a NORM in the Homosexual community.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephebophilia
18
posted on
06/20/2014 10:41:49 AM PDT
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: afraidfortherepublic
Didn’t California allow three parents on a birth certificate?
To: ilovesarah2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson