Posted on 06/19/2014 6:23:10 PM PDT by queenkathy
ADRIAN
Being posted on a submarine in the Pacific Ocean does not exempt a father from obeying child custody orders, a judge ruled Monday in Lenawee County Circuit Court.
(Excerpt) Read more at lenconnect.com ...
I’m not sure of that but I would think so considering he had an atty represent him in court from what I have read.
I see her term is up in January. Gonna be interesting!
Even tho?
Matthew Hindes was given custody of his daughter in 2010 after she was removed from Angela Hindes’ home by Michigan Department of Human Services’ Child Protective Services. An Oct. 1, 2010, divorce judgment gave him permanent custody, but Angela Hindes petitioned for a change in the custody order in August last year.
Was not expecting a Calvinball reference in the midst of this story..well played!
How bright can a judge be who thinks she can just issue a bench warrant for a Sailor who’s in a submarine in the middle of the Pacific Ocean. i think the Navy will have a little to say about this. According to the ABC report yesterday on Good Morning they have notified the Judge that he won’t be able to be there.
Impeach the judge.
My point clarified: There’s a custody battle going on. The father is at sea. Unless the child has been adopted by the sailor’s new wife, the child is not being cared for by a blood relative.
Blood trumps marriage when it comes to caring for kids. Custody gets played like a game. There may be the case that the mother is legitimate lunatic, or she may be not.
The father isn’t around to care for his kid. The mother is fighting for custody.
What’s not being said here is what is the status in terms of child care that the kid is receiving from the new wife?
There have been four/five other threads on this subject if
anyone is interested in reading through them.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=custody
The following link is to the Michigan rules/regs that the judge has to follow
in determining the custody and how it is to be defined/determined.
She is currently in the custody of her stepmother.
There is nothing to suggest that Kaylee is in anyway being mistreated by her stepmother.
The child was taken away from the mother because she was unfit.
She is currently in the custody of her stepmother.
************
What you said above is true. And I think that is what the case is ultimately about.
But the question becomes what the father did or didn’t do in regards to custodial
arrangements when he got sole custody. He’s now gone and left the child in
custody/guardianship of his current wife. We don’t know if he made legal
arrangements for that situation or not.
It’s an unfortunate situation that the child has to go through.
Judge orders break in sailor’s child custody case
Posted: Jun 22, 2014 3:37 PM EST Updated: Jun 22, 2014 3:37 PM EST
ADRIAN, Mich. (AP) - A Michigan judge has called a time-out in a child custody dispute involving a sailor aboard a U.S. submarine.
Lenawee County Judge Margaret Noe released an order Sunday, delaying some matters until at least Oct. 22.
The judge cited a federal law that suspends court action when a member of the armed services is away. Noe says she didn’t know Hindes was in the Pacific Ocean until June 16 when he was supposed to appear or have someone bring his 6-year-old daughter to court.
Hindes, his wife and daughter live near Seattle. The judge says ex-wife Angela Hindes of Ohio still is allowed parenting time. She’ll consider that issue Monday.
Noe has been criticized for her handling of the case. She says facts have been sacrificed for “sensational stories.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.