Replies

“I know this is argumentitive, but I think it’s a concept we need to deal with here.”

Not argumentative to me anyway. Here’s my brutally frank opinion on this:

The last time this country (when it was the country most of us knew) was at war with a suicidal, fanatical entity (Japan), we defeated them by starting a campaign of literally blowing them off the face of the earth. Erased. Gone. The Japs have been good little bitches since then.

Same principle applies here, only with better weapontry: Muslims are the enemy, a suicidal and fanatical enemy. Kill them all. We have the technology, use it. Deport the ones that are here, en masse, and exterminate them in their sh*tholes where they crawled out from.

This country should never send another person to die “over there”; send the bombers in and, like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, blow them off the face of the earth. Then let’s see how “bad” they are.

They are sub-animals; they only understand fear and death. Give it to them, everyone else will be better off.

I understand your logic. I still don’t think we can do that sort of things in this day and age.

There are many Islamic people who go to work each day, or at least busy themselves with providing for their family and contributing to the immediate society that they live in. I don’t buy into the theory that all Islamic people are evil. There are parts of Islam I detest. I’m not writing the rules for how those folks live their lives. I view it as more of a Star Trek leave their civilization alone as long as they leave us alone situation. And most of them leave us alone. It’s the pricks that ruin it for all of us.

Many Iraqis want to live in peace, screw the bloody holy war crap. They help us when we come in to help them. We do have problems there, but some of them actually help us.

They’re not all running around all over the planet trying to take out Westerners, U.S. Citizens, Jews, or Israelis.

Do we nuke them or bombard them off the planet just to get to the bad guys?

In the instance of Japan, there was a clearly defined situation where tens of thousands of U.S. troops were at stake, if we didn’t end the war without a full scale invasion.

Here’s another down-side to us using nukes again. If we do it, other nations get a green light. Today if another nation uses them, they are an instant pariah. If we’ve already done it, not so much. They get a green light of sorts.

I think there is an argument to be made to simply mow these pricks down as they move their convoy and forces around Iraqi territory. Just send in some munitions and eradicate massive numbers of them.

Other than that, attack training camps. Just eradicate these people from the face of the planet.

If it’s a terrorist camp, just drop a daisy cutter on it and be done with it.

Execute the guys you pick up off the field of battle. Quit playing by humane rules. Absolutely never hand back generals of these operations. Disappear them. Send back their head to their operations unit.

We’ve played by idiotic rules. That’s why they’re emboldened. They don’t think we’ll come back in.

I’d send the message to 50 different targets in one morning to make it clear that’s not the case. 25,000 fewer terrorists... all in all a very good start to a new ugly future for those who wish to their lives terrorizing others.

RE:”This country should never send another person to die “over there”; send the bombers in and, like Hiroshima and Nagasaki, blow them off the face of the earth. Then let’s see how “bad” they are.”

Not a chance of that happening for multiple reasons.

In fact GWB/Mccain style invasions are off the table too now, even if we were to really need one.

Its call the boy crying wolf, but this boy (Cheney) cried ‘Mushroom clouds over US cities” as the wolf.