Posted on 06/17/2014 12:50:47 PM PDT by Mozilla
Shock: Fmr. Breitbart Journo Did Extensive DNA Research; Will Destroy Obama’s Legacy!?
@CrushTheCFR @jkryn @HGTomato When I have something to announce, I'll announce it but I'm not going to be dragged into something by Orly.
— Charles C. Johnson (@ChuckCJohnson) May 21, 2014
@ChuckCJohnson @Birther_Watch @CrushTheCFR @jkryn @HGTomato The best remedy for Obots; Ignore them...
— Birther Report (@BirtherReport) May 21, 2014
@BirtherReport when I have something to announce I will announce it. Until then I ask everyone leave me alone to finish my work.
— Charles C. Johnson (@ChuckCJohnson) May 21, 2014
Yes she does, but in her defense she's from Russia, and knows very much what communism looks like, and I suspect she is paralyzed with fear at what she sees as communism following her over to her new country.
Thinking the darkness has followed you and that you HAVE to DO SOMETHING to stop it might result in many of us looking a little nutty.
Yes there are. It's because the legal system has become a religion dominated by left wing kooks since Roosevelt. It is long past time it should have been excised root and branch.
Yes, we can all see it's so distracting to you because you spend virtually your entire presence on Free Republic chasing after anyone who suggests that Obama is illegitimate. You make a point to show up in every thread where his legitimacy is being discussed so that you can rush to his defense.
One would get the impression that rather than being a "distraction" for you, it is the central focus of your online presence at this website.
There is considerable debate concerning both the magazine issue and the date of publishing. There are some very dubious claims being made on both sides that are difficult to prove.
You make a good point, thanks for the reply.
I figured after making this claim I was going to have to hunt up that link. Here it is.
It's a multi-part series, and it would appear pretty conclusive to me.
I think that Lucas Smith’s BC is an obvious forgery, and as he is a convicted forger it seems almost certain he forged it himself. I haven’t seen anything yet that arises to the level of evidence that disputes Obama’s birth narrative.
Pardon me for agreeing with Sarah Palin and for not wanting conservatives to make fools out of themselves.
My opinion is that this was always a loser issue for conservatives that actually benefitted Obama’s election and reelection.
I have no problem with anyone pursuing their pet lost causes, but at least they should get the facts straight so that they don’t get ridiculed.
There is a reason why no committee of the House of Representatives, even committees chaired by members of the Tea Party caucus, have ever held a single hour of hearings on this “issue.”
No, I’m a Sarah Palin messenger: “It’s distracting, It gets annoying. And let’s just stick with what really matters.”
It doesn’t appear that you have grasped the fact that the last thing that the Republican Party wants is to remove Barack Obama from the presidency at this stage.
The party WANTS his ignorant face and his utter failure of leadership to be the face of all things Democrat in both 2014 and in 2016. There simply aren’t the votes in the Senate (67 needed) to remove him via impeachment.
Plus his ego and his arrogance won’t permit him to resign.
On the Bomford forgery:
On Lucas D. Smith, his state of Iowa felony conviction record:
1) #023705 STATE OF IOWA VS SMITH, LUCAS DANIEL
Felony 715.A(2) – forgery guilty 5/22/1998
2) #144901 STATE VS LUCAS D SMITH
Felony, forgery 715A.2(B) — Forgery – guilty plea to 3 counts – 2/28/2000
3) #034823 STATE OF IOWA VS SMITH, LUCAS DANIEL SMITH
Felony 714.2(2) theft, 2nd degree- guilty 5/25/2000
4) #054329 STATE VS SMITH, LUCAS DANIEL
Felony – 714.2(4) theft-4th degree – 4 counts guilty (srms);
(This action also included a felony count of 715A.2(A) Forgery which was dismissed, most likely as part of a plea bargain) 12/28/2000
5) #182543 STATE VS LUCAS D SMITH
Felony – 714.2(3) – theft, 3rd degree — guilty 8/9/2004 (multiple counts)
So basically there are 5 separate felony convictions, some involving multiple counts, between 1998 and 2004.
Here are some of the issues with the Lucas D. Smith Kenyan Birth Certificate:
1) Smith tried to sell his copy on E-Bay
2) The hospital administrator is wrong. In “February 19 of 2009,” the date stamped on the Smith document and the month when Smith claims he visited Kenya, the chief administrator of the hospital was Jennifer Othigo. Her tenure included “February 19 of 2009” because of newspaper articles naming her as chief administrator on February 1, 2009 and February 26, 2009. Maganga, the person listed as chief administrator on the Smith document did not assume that post until months later.
3) The certificate bears the seal of the hospital. A seal signifies a certified copy. Generally hospitals don’t issue certified copies, jurisdictions do. The seal should be that of the government of Kenya (or the district), not the hospital.
4) worldnetdaily.com says they have a real Kenyan birth certificate from the time period, and this one doesn’t look the one they published. This is not a fatal error because the WND document is a real government-issued birth certificate, while the Lucas document would be closer to a hospital souvenir birth certificate.
4) The signature has the pre-printed title “Supervisor of Obstetrics” when there are all sorts of conditions when someone else might sign the form. In pretty much any real form, the title of the signer is a blank to be filled in. For example, the Bomford example from South Australia has a blank to fill in.
5) Neither parent signed the certificate. Of course if this is only a hospital souvenir, then the parents would not have to sign, but why is is a souvenir sealed and signed to make it look like an official document? On an official birth registration form the person providing the information about father and mother (i.e. the father or mother) must sign the form.
If a pregnant Ann Obama was going to Kenya in 1961, Mombasa was the last place she should have been delivering a baby. Mombasa is on the eastern coast, the airport is in Nairobi in the center of the country and the grandparents’ village was in the opposite direction from Mombasa on Kenya’s western border. Mombasa was a stupid mistake made early on (e.g. in the original complaint of Berg v Obama), and copied by true believers ever since.
Obama Sr.’s father was against the marriage and Obama Sr. already had a wife there, which begs the question of why to go to Africa in the first place and particularly in the middle of a civil war.
6) The date format used throughout the document is mm/dd/yy. Kenya uses dd/yy/mm format. Kenyan university application requirements pages located online specify that birth certificates are in dd/yy/mm format. (Smith claims that Kenya used both British and American date formats, but provided no reason to believe that this is true).
7) Obama Sr’s birth date is only a year but Stanley Ann shows a full date of birth. Why is the the father’s full date of birth missing? The year was all that was on the Wikipedia, but we now know from immigration files that the day of birth was June 18, but this was not known publicly when the Smith Kenyan certificate surfaced. This is a bit of a smoking gun.
8) The Smith Kenyan birth certificate has been submitted as an exhibit to several courts, going back to 2009 and as recently as last month in an all-Republican appeal before the all-Republican Alabama Supreme Court (McInnish, Goode v. Chapman). This birth certificate has had no positive impact on the outcome of any trial or appeal.
And the second part of my question? Do you believe Obama’s story, including the details, about being born in HI?
I haven’t seen any evidence to contradict it, so yes.
You’ve seen no evidence to contradict Obama’s steadfast claim that his parents lived together for two years?
I haven’t seen the steadfast claims - do you have the links?
and you gather that from a dolphin that you swam with in the ocean?
So no links then?
I see nothing in your link that substantaites your claim.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.