Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Immigrants are drawn to the magnet of free market capitalism here in the United States”
Not they’re not, you idiot. They’re drawn here by all the “free” sh** you and your merry band of traitors keep handing them year after year.
2 posted on
06/13/2014 10:03:26 PM PDT by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To late Randee-Boy, you are in favor of AMNESTY for Illegal Alien Invaders from Mexico.
3 posted on
06/13/2014 10:03:28 PM PDT by
Graewoulf
(Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The only thing that is broken is the enforcement of our current laws.
4 posted on
06/13/2014 10:04:34 PM PDT by
alpo
(What would Selco do?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
5 posted on
06/13/2014 10:04:34 PM PDT by
SIDENET
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Make this your policy, Rand, and no one will be able to smear you with it.
- Deport illegal aliens on contact with LE.
- Enforce the law vigorously on employers of illegals.
- Strong border security. Build the physical fence and use high-tech surveillance.
- Eliminate entitlements for illegal aliens.
- End the "anchor baby" policy.
Do those things and illegal aliens will deport themselves and pay for the trip.
6 posted on
06/13/2014 10:04:50 PM PDT by
TigersEye
("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Congressional Republicans will never again take a no legalization, period position after Obamas landslide among Latinos in 2012. Then the country is finished. Any legislation that allows the lawbreakers to stay and work here is amnesty. When you reward something, you get more of it. An amnesty will cost $6.3 trillion. So much for being a fiscal conservative.
7 posted on
06/13/2014 10:08:11 PM PDT by
kabar
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I will only support reform that has border security first as verifiable and ascertained by Congress, not the president.
The same old canard -- border security first.
If that is 'first', it could be accomplished WITH EXISTING LAWS. So, we don't need new laws until ...
Seems to be a dead ender.
But, Paul, like many of the others, is jumping around the issue with nuances and parsing of what the meaning of amnesty really is.
8 posted on
06/13/2014 10:10:41 PM PDT by
TomGuy
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Only idiots will buy his latest line of bullshit.SCREW HIM.
9 posted on
06/13/2014 10:12:22 PM PDT by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Isn’t Norquist an islamist?
10 posted on
06/13/2014 10:13:15 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: 2ndDivisionVet
They come here for the free ride of our welfare state. he needs to admit that he screwed up.
11 posted on
06/13/2014 10:13:59 PM PDT by
Busko
(The only thing that is certain is that nothing is certain.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
13 posted on
06/13/2014 10:18:42 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The more numerous the laws, the more corrupt the government." --Tacitus)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Rand Paul: I won't allow you to smear me by claiming that I'm for amnesty...
...I'll prove it beyond all doubt.
14 posted on
06/13/2014 10:20:02 PM PDT by
867V309
(Don't tread on me, bro)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Mr. Paul, I consider you to be with the enemy.
That is all.
15 posted on
06/13/2014 10:22:17 PM PDT by
chris37
(heartless)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
If he wants to maintain credibility, why hang out with Norquist at all. He’s irrelevant, a Jihad-baby, and a crony?
Paul has been more than a little duplicitous on this issue. He’ll need to personally apologize to Freepers and acknowledge his error before I trust him.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
This is what the intellectual godfather of the libertarian movement said about immigration and the welfare state:
Milton Friedman: There is no doubt that free and open immigration is the right policy in a libertarian state, but in a welfare state it is a different story: the supply of immigrants will become infinite.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
He’s still trying to triangulate this issue! That is just slimy at this point. If you’re not for it, then step up against it. I’d think riding the fence like that would require wearing a cup. Pick a team, Rand, though it looks like you already have.
20 posted on
06/13/2014 10:40:51 PM PDT by
cdcdawg
(Be seeing you...)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
>> I am for immigration reform because what we have now is untenable.
Enforce the law. Unequivocally. No talk of “reform”, just enforce existing law. If it’s “broken” how will you know what’s broken if you don’t use it?
Enforce existing law. Anything else: good bye.
21 posted on
06/13/2014 10:41:46 PM PDT by
Ray76
(True change requires true change - A Second Party ...or else it's more of the same...)
>> Republicans dont want to because they want the border open for cheap labor
The implication that Democrats are not exploiting this labor force is absurd.
23 posted on
06/13/2014 10:47:25 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Hey Rand: it just depends on what the meaning of “is” is.
None of these amnesty pimps ever want to own their own agenda.
If you won’t enforce the law, which requires foreign nationals to be deported back to their own country, then you are for amnesty.
It doesn’t matter what cute name you come up with to hide the fact. ‘Regularization’ ‘Normalization’ ‘Special Work Permit’.
It’s all bullcrap. It’s all just Amnesty by Another Name.
24 posted on
06/13/2014 10:50:39 PM PDT by
Pelham
(Either Deportation or Amnesty.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Ok Rand, whatever you want to call it it's still de facto amnesty.
28 posted on
06/13/2014 11:05:45 PM PDT by
Bullish
(You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-38 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson