Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Resettozero

Prosecuted? by whom? Impeachment is the intended vehicle to stop a President that is out of control.


8 posted on 06/08/2014 10:26:58 AM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk
Prosecuted? by whom? Impeachment is the intended vehicle to stop a President that is out of control.

Don't know; perhaps someone connected with the legal profession? Okay then...impeach him!
10 posted on 06/08/2014 10:30:13 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

Is it possible to prosecute a POTUS after he has been impeached and removed from office?


11 posted on 06/08/2014 10:30:21 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
I agree that impeachment isn't the answer. Obama would use that to rally his supporters. I sometimes wonder if that isn't what he's trying to do.

Criminal prosecution of those who implement Obama's policies might be easier. If lawsuits were filed against the likes of Susan Rice and Valerie Jarrett (among others) it might make others back away from being part of Obama's "unanimous decisions".

27 posted on 06/08/2014 10:48:01 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

Exactly. There is absolutely no authority whatsoever to prosecute a president. He has to be impeached before prosecuted. It may even say that directly in the Constitution.


34 posted on 06/08/2014 10:59:12 AM PDT by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk
Prosecuted? by whom? Impeachment is the intended vehicle to stop a President that is out of control.

Not by the Attorney General.

This is one of the stupidest and most unconstitutional ideas I've seen recently.

The Constitution provides explicitly for control of a rogue President by impeachment and removal from office. Requires a majority of the House and 2/3 of the Senate.

Shapiro would apparently prefer to replace this constitutional provision for a political process with a criminal trial before a judge and 12 jurors. I strongly suspect the Founders would recoil in horror.

I firmly believe our Union would be much stronger today if every fourth or fifth president on average had been impeached and removed from office. None of this idiocy about "three co-equal branches of government."

The Founders intended the representative of the people and states, in Congress, to be in ultimate control of the government. This intent has arguably been denatured by direct election of the Senate, but the principle still survives, albeit somewhat damaged.

The very last thing we need to do is empower unelected judges to decide when a president should be removed from office.

46 posted on 06/08/2014 11:09:07 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

“Prosecuted? by whom? Impeachment is the intended vehicle to stop a President that is out of control.”

Normally the prosecutor would be the U.S. Attorney-General, but Holder is a co-defendent in this prosecution and cannot be expected to prosecute the case. So, the U.S. House of Representatives would appoint a Special Prosecutor to handle the case against defendent Obama and the co-defendents. This move would be intended to sidestep the Democrat majority and its control of the U.S. Senate who are obstructing any hope of an effective impeachment trial in the U.S. Senate.


58 posted on 06/08/2014 11:26:21 AM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson