Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/31/2014 6:33:14 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All


Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


2 posted on 05/31/2014 6:35:12 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The War on Coal seems bleak. The warriors include all envirowhacko’s, the prez, most democrats, academia, the EPA and the MSM, etc.


6 posted on 05/31/2014 6:48:36 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
The bad news for the fellows in this article is that the Obama administration is waging a war on coal here in the U.S.

The good news is that China, India, and other countries with something like 60% of the world's population isn't held to any standards when it comes to the burning of fossil fuels.

The really good news is that all of these countries are building coal-fired power plants like there's no tomorrow.

The really, really good news is that U.S. coal mines are shipping a lot of coal overseas to these countries so they can burn coal in their new plants ... since the coal that they burn there apparently doesn't cause global warming climate change.

7 posted on 05/31/2014 6:50:44 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("What in the wide, wide world of sports is goin' on here?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Coal production in India:


Coal production in China:

9 posted on 05/31/2014 7:06:39 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wyo. needs to send two local Ted Cruz types to the Senate.


10 posted on 05/31/2014 7:11:14 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Obama suggests his upcoming rule on coal plants will avert long-term health crisis
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3162261/posts


12 posted on 05/31/2014 7:31:29 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2Million USD for Cruz and/or Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
In a May news conference, Gov. Matt Mead declared coal’s troubles a “concern,” saying he worried the industry’s woes could negatively affect the state’s budget. The governor has involved Wyoming in a dozen lawsuits against the EPA during his tenure, many concerning air pollution at coal-fired power plants.

“I do think there is a war on coal” Mead said.

The Obama administration, for its part, says there is no such war. “Coal is part of the energy mix today, and it will be for decades into the future,” EPA administrator Gina McCarthy told Basin Electric Power Cooperative employees during a February visit to the company’s Synfuels plant in Beulah, North Dakota.

I'm relieved. The Obama administration assures me there's no war on coal. Thank goodness my electric rates aren't going to "necessarily skyrocket."

I'm also smug and happy with the Obama assurances that I can keep my doc, my deductible, my premiums, and my insurance company.

15 posted on 05/31/2014 8:58:59 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
A coal-fired plant's CO2 emissions are approximately double that of a gas-fired plant. Sequestration/capture is very expensive, as the article points out. However, CO2 is just a global warming issue, which we agree is a red herring. A modern coal plant removes the harmful gases and particulates from the flue gas: N2, H2O, O2, NOx, SOx and fly ash. CO2 sequestration/capture has no environmental value and no economic value other than for petroleum extraction. I have been unable to find data on the cost per MW of capacity of a new coal-fired plant that removes these gases and particulates, but does not sequester/capture CO2.

Absent the global warming scare about CO2, a new coal-fired plant, which removes all emissions harmful to health, has a lower cost per KWH of output than a new gas-fired plant.

There is therefore no rationale for the about-to-be-proposed EPA regulations. If implemented, they should be removed by a future Republican administration.

16 posted on 05/31/2014 9:32:01 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wyoming’s a red state. To this administration, what difference does it make?


18 posted on 05/31/2014 10:11:34 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Wyoming has the best type coal; much of it is radioactive.


20 posted on 05/31/2014 10:27:34 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Do The Math)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Then Wyoming had just as well get ready for a big change because there are not enough people there to matter.

The strategy goes on. Target small groups that can’t defend themselves.


25 posted on 06/01/2014 7:50:17 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If I had to hazard a guess, I’d say that the families of the children of the mechanics who fix the mines’ great diesel trucks, the welders who staff their machine shops and the railroad employees who see the final product shipped across the country and beyond all vote Democrat.


28 posted on 06/01/2014 12:28:40 PM PDT by Arm_Bears (Shoot cops that shoot dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson