Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/22/2014 5:46:52 AM PDT by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: thackney

Does it matter, Thackney?

Would they have gone after the oil in California anyway?


2 posted on 05/22/2014 5:49:52 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Drilling in California is not necessary. Leave them to their enviro lunacy and eventual bankruptcy.


3 posted on 05/22/2014 5:51:06 AM PDT by saganite (What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

So the Sierra Club got their people inside to write this report.
A great tactic to use against shale oil production.
Clever; we need to fight the same way.


4 posted on 05/22/2014 5:53:00 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Obama lied; our healthcare died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Estimates for oil drop by 96% between scientific studies. This is the study of rock, geology, and current drilling technology and economics, all solid, measurable, and with not much variation over the short run.

In contrast, the global warming is “settled science”, “the debate is over”, on a topic where even the key drivers of temperature are being debated, where previous forecasts have proven totally worthless, and where the role of the sun seems to be barely looked at. And people wonder why the “deniers” laugh at the warmists’ efforts to suppress the debate!


5 posted on 05/22/2014 5:54:20 AM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
What's with the "enormous" big scary numbers?
Less water than what a family uses in a year to frack a well, compared to 38 million Californians, is hardly "enormous".

6 posted on 05/22/2014 5:57:02 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Somebody inflated the numbers so that somebody could make a quick buck off of investors or grants, methinks.


9 posted on 05/22/2014 6:00:52 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I suspect political chicanery


10 posted on 05/22/2014 6:01:03 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

” - - - The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) - the statistical arm of the Department of Energy - - - “

Do you have a typo? The correct term is the PROPAGANDA Arm, not the statistical arm, based solely on post mortems of their previous public estimates.

[Keep in mind that this IS an official estimate by the Keystone Cops, US Federal Government, proud provider of the VA Hospital and Obamacare failed money pits.]

BTW, will the Chinese, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, AG Holder, POS Obama and Jerry Brown be forbidden to bid on the soon to be decreased mineral rights value of the Monterrey Shale acreage?


15 posted on 05/22/2014 6:14:27 AM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Either bad science (estimates are worthless) or politics (screw the estimates) at work here. Wish I knew which.


16 posted on 05/22/2014 6:14:42 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I understand the cline isn’t doing well either.


19 posted on 05/22/2014 6:23:45 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
it takes 127,000 gallons of water to frack a well

or about 5 swimming pools worth, which in Hollywood is equivalent to 3-4 wells per city block.

22 posted on 05/22/2014 6:27:10 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

If there was a Saudi sized oil field just 100 feet below ground in the middle of the desert east of San Bernadino they would ban its recovery for some stupid reason.

The California of today is the result of all those migrations to it for over a hundred years..................


25 posted on 05/22/2014 6:38:49 AM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Is this report more influenced by science or politics? It seems rather convenient.


26 posted on 05/22/2014 6:41:07 AM PDT by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

The article is so full of crap I don’t know where to start.

So I won’t.


28 posted on 05/22/2014 6:50:41 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

Interesting article. There is no denying that fracking is good for local economies. It may already be having a large beneficial impact on the national economy. Despite the claims of environmental alarmists, I’m not aware of any significant adverse environmental impact from fracking.

That said, they do have water issues in California. According to the article, it takes as much water to frack a well as to meet the needs of a family of four. Is that a lot? How much oil and gas would they get from that well?

Last I heard, desalinization plants take a lot of energy which could be supplied by nuclear energy. Of course, nuclear energy is anathema to many so-called environmentalists. Are CA’s water problems partially self-inflicted? Maybe they have been ignoring a valid solution for years.


30 posted on 05/22/2014 6:54:09 AM PDT by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

This revised report,no doubt,came after a big donation to Rat Party Headquarters by Earth First.


31 posted on 05/22/2014 7:00:07 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Rat Party Policy:Lie,Deny,Refuse To Comply)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

The estimate is expected to be made public in June? What’s this article then, chopped liver?


36 posted on 05/22/2014 7:06:05 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
the statistical arm of the Department of Energy - has downgraded its estimate of the total amount of recoverable oil in the Monterey Shale by a whopping 96 percent

Why is that any surprise?

Is it a coincidence that unemployment rates "plunged" just before the 2012 election?

Is it a coincidence that obummercare enrollments suddenly surged above the "magic 6 million" mark on the last day of program enrollment?

I'll bet obummer never knew about this until he heard about it in the news.

42 posted on 05/22/2014 8:11:28 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney
Fracking involves enormous quantities of water; an average of 127,127 gallons of water were required to frack a single California well in 2013, according to the Western States Petroleum Association. That's equivalent to 87 percent of the water a family of four uses in an entire year.

They can actually frack an entire well with less water than a family of four uses in a single year?!

Seriously, that's a figurative drop in the bucket.

45 posted on 05/22/2014 8:17:46 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: thackney

I know we have some folks here who’ve worked in the oil industry. I’d be more interested in what the industry is saying about the feasability of recovering oil that a bunch of FedGov fags.


55 posted on 05/22/2014 8:47:14 AM PDT by zeugma (Don't cry because it's over, smile because it happened - Dr. Seuss)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson