Skip to comments.
Republicans, Local Sheriff Warn Border Wilderness Zone Will Create Vast Drug Corridor
breitbart.com ^
| 5/19/2014
| Kristin Tate
Posted on 05/20/2014 7:38:44 AM PDT by rktman
A pending proposal from President Obama to create a vast new wilderness area on the U.S.-Mexico border is drawing criticism from Republican lawmakers and local law enforcement officials who say it would significantly impede border security.
The Obama administration is set to designate a 600,000 acre national monument in south-central New Mexico to be managed and controlled by the Bureau of Land Management, a federal agency. The designated land will be called the Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument, and environmentalists have long-sought the designation.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: aliens; blm; otms; trespassers; undocumented
Security problem? What security problem? Once the lyin' king proclaims the land "sacred", you know the coyote's and the trespassers that would transit the area will move elsewhere out of fear of violating US law. Errrr. Never mind. Might as well go ahead and cut some trails for them and don't forget to put up watering stations too. I think this is also one of the "earth island" areas the man and the biosphere nut bags have been after for a long time. You know. To create a "corridor" for those lovable little critters.
1
posted on
05/20/2014 7:38:44 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
environmentalists have long-sought the designation Herein lies the problem.
2
posted on
05/20/2014 7:41:21 AM PDT
by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: rktman
I have been to the area. Dry. Dry, dry, dry. Can’t farm it, can’t develop it. Dry. Is their oil or gas? I don’t know. If Oil and gas is present go get it. It’s not good for anything else.
3
posted on
05/20/2014 7:47:03 AM PDT
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deco et Vives)
To: rktman
How about we call it a free fire zone.
4
posted on
05/20/2014 7:49:48 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
To: rktman
"Republican lawmakers and local law enforcement officials say it would significantly impede border security"

5
posted on
05/20/2014 8:00:36 AM PDT
by
Iron Munro
(The “fourth estate”has morphed into a 5th column)
To: rktman
Dig a canal/moat from Texas to California. We don’t need to go to Panama anymore anyhow.
6
posted on
05/20/2014 8:14:35 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(The new witchhunt: "Do you NOW, . . . or have you EVER , . . supported traditional marriage?")
To: rktman
Take the Senate in Nov and defund the BLM in 2015!
Zero, zip, nadda, dollars to the BLM, everything go back to the states to manage.
7
posted on
05/20/2014 8:18:27 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
To: DariusBane; Jeff Head; Noumenon; Carry_Okie
I have also been to the Organ mountains.They bump up against WSMR.
New Mexico watermelon greenies have long been foaming at the mouth wanting this done. Unfortunately, i don’t think there is enough local opposition to stop it.
8
posted on
05/20/2014 8:26:10 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
To: sauropod
Why do they want that wasteland?
9
posted on
05/20/2014 8:28:04 AM PDT
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deco et Vives)
To: DariusBane
All about deep ecology and wildlife buffer zones and wildlife corridors.
10
posted on
05/20/2014 8:29:14 AM PDT
by
sauropod
(Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
To: sauropod
The area only supports a few of the very hardy desert animals. I do mean a very few.
11
posted on
05/20/2014 8:32:01 AM PDT
by
DariusBane
(Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deco et Vives)
To: rktman
Border Wilderness Zone Will Create Vast Drug Corridor
By design?
Too many on both sides of the border are benefitting from the free flow of illicit drugs.
Too many in high positions on both sides of the border are benefitting from the free flow of illicit drugs.
12
posted on
05/20/2014 8:50:05 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: DariusBane
Because its a popular jeeping and off roading destination. They are trying to stop that.
13
posted on
05/20/2014 9:03:17 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
To: sauropod
“All about deep ecology and wildlife buffer zones and wildlife corridors.”
That’s not what its about, those are their rationalizations/excuses. Its about killing off roading because they hate anyone being outdoors who isn’t on a 2 week sojourn hike.
14
posted on
05/20/2014 9:06:21 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson