Only by ignoring original conditions... (which is not logical)
Also note how he quotes/refers to his own posts as authority while refusing to address direct confrontation on the original facts...
Anything he has said has ignored the original wrong while focusing on the 'feelings' issue of the poor drunk.. And then circled that tree. And then circled that tree. And then... ad infinitum.
Well, I can’t deny most of that.
I disagree with his defense of the defenseless.