#unlesswehaveapresidentwithballs all is lost.
You’ll know the Liberals are serious when they start to leave flowers and teddy bears in front of the school where the girls were kidnapped.
Everybody duck!
Our peaceful “American” Muslims are totally outraged about this abduction in Nigeria and they’re letting you know that in no uncertain terms.
Steyn ping.
I was thinking of the slang term for said glands and was going to suggest #BringBackOurBoys.
#YouhavenoideahowmuchImissPresidentReagan
AC/DC (not for the white-suck metrosexuals)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W-fIn2QZgg
Great article... I bet this hashtag is on Twitter now.
MOAB jihadis.
#OurGirls, British, French, Americans, Israelis, Germans, Aussies.
One of these things is not like the others - can you find it?
The face has just the right expression..
First of all, They’re not OUR girls... They’re Islam’s girls.
They are the one’s who should be out raged and do something about it.As always, the west gets blamed for their monstrous behavior. It’s their problem and when we try to help, we will get stabbed in the back as always.
Maybe a stern letter to The Times will do the trick?
#WeCareMoreThanYou
That’s why Liberals love hashtags, it’s another way they can show how much they care; like the stupid ribbons.
There are only a half-dozen special forces around the planet capable of doing that without getting most or all of the hostages killed: the British, the French, the Americans, Israelis, Germans, Aussies, maybe a couple of others. So, unless [elite Special Forces action] . . . is being lined up, those schoolgirls are headed into slavery, and the wretched pleading passivity of Mrs Obama's hashtag is just a form of moral preening.Theodore Roosevelt said, It is not the critic who counts . . . the credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena . . . That is what liberalism" used to mean everywhere - and what it continued to mean elsewhere, long after the inversion of the meaning of the word in America in the 1920s.But then what isn't? The blogger Daniel Payne wrote this week that "modern liberalism, at its core, is an ideology of talking, not doing".
In America now, The idea around which liberalism' coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR. Which I adopted as my tagline there for a while . . .
Once understand that liberalism is simply PR uber alles, and the reason why the masters of PR - objective journalists - would be simpatico with liberalism becomes excruciatingly obvious.As to why journalists are able to coalesce around a single ideology, and to monopolize the claim to objectivity, that is precisely the sort of conspiracy against the public which is, and Adam Smith asserted in Wealth of Nations, only to be expected when People of the same trade "meet together" as persistently as journalists communicating via the Associated Press newswire do.