Posted on 05/06/2014 10:52:56 AM PDT by PoloSec
Let’s say you had a juicy story to tell…
A story that could be potentially damaging to a powerful entity you deem to be discriminatory to a particular group of people…
And in putting together your story, you build its entire foundation on a specific account…
Except…that account turns out to be proven as 100-percent false.
Do you still stand by your story? Or do you retract said story and apologize for the error?
If you’re one online publication, you neither retract nor apologize. Instead, you double down on nothing
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
What!! Shepard Smith is a homo?!?!?!?!
After reading the story I still don’t know..............
I guess only his hair dresser knows for sure.......................
Shepard Smith is a pickle-smoker?
“I believe you can lie about any number of things and still be considered an honest person.” — Dan Rather
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.