The first Democrat to speak at today’s hearing (Cummings) reads a prepared statement about how messy things were in LIBYA. He doesn’t specifically speak about Benghazi. Why? Because the Democrats have thrown in the towel on Benghazi and are falling back to their final defensive positions around Hillary and Obama. Hillary and Obama probably aided and abetted our nation’s enemies in Libya, and that is treason. Conviction of treason can get you a death sentence. Knowingly helping traitors is collusion and accessory to a crime and the Democrats, including the media, better come clean or they could wind up sitting in a federal pen.
Obama's Arab Spring brought down Egypt's Mubarak, then Libya's Gaddafi, the next guy on Obama's takedown list, was Syria's Assad. (Who is Assad's protector?) And they were using Gaddafi's stockpile of weapons to arm the Syrian rebels. But somebody hijacked Gaddafi weapons and it appears for the time being 'saved' Assad.
Obama had a weapons running operation in Benghazi. Was this even discussed today? Apparently not. Why not? Who hijacked Obama's weapons out of Benghazi? Somebody is sitting upon a stockpile, apparently containing all manner of weapons. Where did Gaddafi weapons go?
I personally believe part of the non-response was because had our military took action in Benghazi, that city would have been turned into a dust filled crater. Had that city blew then the whole world would be demanding answers about what was happening in Benghazi. Lying to Americans via their puppets in the media was not a difficult choice to make. Play dumb and lie.
Furthermore, why did Egypt's newly Obama picked leader, Morsi, have a mob in Benghazi? Why it had to have been preplanned given the 'faux internet video' show coming out of Cairo before this hijacking.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3026645/posts