Sarah Palin: ‘Waterboarding is how we’d baptize terrorists’ in her administration

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK

You kind of have a history of shooting your mouth off, getting called on it, and then starting long thread-wars wherein you have to get the Last Word.

There are also "supporters" that "just kind of show up".

Fascinating.Oh so instead of answering when Palin changed her policy, you're going to resarch me and try to get me to leave the thread that way.

It's interesting who seems the most desperate to win here. Thanks for proving who the "Last Worder" truly is.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK

This started on the very first page of this thread.

Someone slammed Palin, KC_Lion slammed that person back, and then you jumped in on KC_Lion with "She is a failed half term governor".

I refuse to let you get away with DUmpster/DailyKos garbage on Free Republic.

And here we are.

And yet, what have we been talking about for going on two weeks? What is linked at the bottom of this post? Is it some sort of insult to Paliin based on her time as the governor of Alaska, or does it link to a statement of her policy, namely to Register between 20 to 35 million illegal aliens, and allow them to Remain in Place. Let's see if you can figure it out.

More misdirection from the vacant one...

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

I'm just noting the historical problems you have with your mouth.

And the fascinating sequence of events after you get in trouble with it.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

I'm just noting the historical problems you have with your mouth.

And the fascinating sequence of events after you get in trouble with it.

I have no problem with you researching me. Go ahead. What else do you have? You lost this debate once it started. Since then you've tried many different tactics and topics to move me off the question, and or force me off the thread. Even the linking of Jim to the thread didn't gain you the victory you sought.

And you have the nerve to call me a "Last Worder" even after you doing that? Like I said, you're a real hoot.

Here is Plain's interview where she explains her plans to Register illegal aliens and allow them to Remain in Place.

You can listen if you like.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

DoughtyOne wrote:

Even the linking of Jim to the thread didn't gain you the victory you sought.

I don't need Jim Robinson to fight my battles for me. In 1997, we all learned how to handle ourselves.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

Then why did you link him? As I have said a number of times by now, you're a real hoot.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

I don't need Jim Robinson to fight my battles for me. In 1997, we all learned how to handle ourselves.

Why do I have no problem believing that?

Evidently they didn't teach you not to link in Jim when you go off the rails. They were teaching us that by early 1998.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

DoughtyOne wrote:

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

People who support the forum, who work hard on getting financial support for the forum, and who work at the sometimes thankless job of moderating the forum deserve the utmost respect.

It was not an attack - I was merely concerned someone in one of those roles appeared to be taking a side in our ongoing disagreement.

She has asked me not to ping her again. I am respecting that wish, and presume that she asked my post be pulled.

I would thank you not to mention it again, as per her apparent wishes.

Evidently they didn't teach you not to link in Jim when you go off the rails. They were teaching us that by early 1998.

I need you to show me the post on this thread where I linked in Jim Robinson, or admit that you are mistaken.

If you can show me that, I will admit that I am mistaken about my post #545.

Cat got your keyboard? ;-)

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

Evidently they didn't teach you not to link in Jim when you go off the rails. They were teaching us that by early 1998.

I need you to show me the post on this thread where I linked in Jim Robinson, or admit that you are mistaken. If you can show me that, I will admit that I am mistaken about my post #545.

I researched the thread. I had though you linked in Jim in on one or two posts, but it seems someone else did and I mistakenly thought you had.

It is not true that you had linked Jim in, and am sorry I said you had. I was wrong.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

It’s not something I would do. Jim Robinson has enough to do.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

Cat got your keyboard? ;-)

You asked me to apologize for saying you linked Jim in. I had to see if I had been incorrect when I stated you had. I believe that I was, and I apologized for it.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.

Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

Okay, it appears that is true.

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

DoughtyOne wrote:

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

People who support the forum, who work hard on getting financial support for the forum, and who work at the sometimes thankless job of moderating the forum deserve the utmost respect.

You did not show Trisham respect. You can spin the post any way you like. You made a snide comment to her touching on her efforts on behalf of the forum. It was uncalled for and all three of us know it.

It was not an attack - I was merely concerned someone in one of those roles appeared to be taking a side in our ongoing disagreement.

You haven't minded others coming here to take a side in the disagreement, as long as they were on your side. Whey should it bother you so much that she might not find your comments or behavior here acceptable? Did you really think that everyone was going to approve of the way you have chosen to display your deep respect for Palin here?

She has asked me not to ping her again. I am respecting that wish, and presume that she asked my post be pulled.

We both know why you respected that wish don't we.

I would thank you not to mention it again, as per her apparent wishes.

When she cares to tell me what her ~~apparent~~ wishes are, I will respect them. Unlike you, I respected her wishes enough not to insult her, particularly with regard to her official position here. It's clear she doesn't agree with everything I do. I respect that. I even apologized to her for the way she was treated here.

Up thread I tried to tell you to tone it down. I reminded you this thread will be available for people to review for quite some time. I also reminded you several times, that as long as we continue to post here, folks will see the debate and be drawn here. You made fun of me for trying to help you make less of a visible ass of yourself.

After 2.5 weeks of your abuse, over 550 posts on this thread, I'm not in the mood to remove my comments and link related to you insult of Trisham. It's not the main topic of this thread, so it's not going to remain on my overall framework for long.If you don't want to look like a donkey, don't act like one.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place.
Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

I asked you to drop it, as she apparently wished.

You're bordering on REAL abuse of another apparently uninvolved FReeper.

I admitted I was wrong to myself, and I respected her wishes.

Why can't you?

One Palin Supporter: LINK

Where he admits he hasn't even listened to the interview where Palin states her policy on Register and Remain in Place, that he has argued about for over nine days and over 370 posts deep into this thread. LINK addressed here: LINK

To what depths will they stoop: LINK addressed here: LINK

In this post, I try to explain the massive danger to our nation if the illegal aliens are Registered and allowed to Remain in Place.. LINK I cover a lot in this post, party because the one I responed to touched on so many issues.

Goes for the attack based on a person's efforts to support the froum, because they said something nice to someone who disagreed with him: LINK This link is now dead, as the post was removed. Evidently not univsersally appreciated..

I asked you to drop it, as she apparently wished. You asked me. Wow. You are one amazing..., well nevermind. Did she ask me?

You're bordering on REAL abuse of another apparently uninvolved FReeper. Your insulting post was the real ABUSE. Did that stop you? Now you're desperately trying to turn it all around on me. At some point, you need to return to the real world.

I admitted I was wrong to myself, and I respected her wishes. You stopped posting to her for a reason we both know very well. Lets just leave it at that.

Why can't you? Because I didn't treat her the way you did? I don't know, does that make sense to you? It makes sense to me. You insulted her going way over the top. Now you want me to supposedly respect her wishes. How do you know what her wishes are. Did she tell you what her wishes are? What did she tell you on the matter? I'm interested to know.

The woman came here and said, "Thank you!" to me. That's it. For that you went on the attack. You need to get yourself under control. You've needed to for over two weeks now.

Here's part of her interview with O'Reilly. I'm not a big fan of O'Reilly, but in this interview she again reinforces her intent to register illegal aliens, and that the expectation is that the illegals who register will work. This is from 2010, two years after McCain went down to defeat, and the same year Palin endorsed him to remain the Senator from Arizona over Hayworth. It was also the same year she stood up before a tea party event and assured them McCain was a Tea Party member at heart. She hadn't been his running mate for two years. None the less, she's still hawking the Registration and Remaining in Place. Just post a link to let us know when she changed her policy.

You need to stop disrespecting your FRiend.

Like you, I have been asked by Jim Robinson not to post on this thread any longer.

I plan on honoring his request.

Perhaps you need to stop disrespecting your FRiend.

Please everyone, just let it go.

Thanks