Posted on 04/25/2014 5:06:59 AM PDT by foundedonpurpose
HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip Of Cliven Bundy’s Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTimes’ Deceptively Edited Version Home » Feature » HOAX EXPOSED: Full Clip Of Cliven Bundy’s Non-Racist, Pro-Black, Pro-Mexican, Anti-Government Remarks Vs. NYTimes’ Deceptively Edited Version
Apr 24, 2014 199 Comments Jack Flash
jfjfjfjfjfjfjfjjfjfjfjf
SEE THAT CLIVEN BUNDY IS ACTUALLY AN ADVOCATE FOR BLACKS, HISPANICS
Watch Bundy explain how we need to keep things from going backwards for blacks, and how the Federal government has created a neo-slave class via entitlement dependency that is so bad it is arguably worse than plantation slavery was. It is 100% clear that Cliven Bundy is not saying that blacks should be slaves picking cotton, but that the Federal government has created conditions for them so terrible, that their current situation may actually be worse. (If you are person of low intelligence, the fact that that is his point might be too hard for you to understand.) And he’s not blaming blacks for the issues of abortions, and crime and broken families, he’s blaming the Feds. This is the exact opposite of a racist, this is an advocate for the welfare and best interests of blacks. And just as importantly, you’ll at the end of the video he gives passionate praise and defense of hispanic illegal aliens, lauding them for “better family structures than most white peoples’” Racist? Why is he praising Mexicans as better than whites, if he’s some sort of white supremacist racist?. Take a hike all you lying, character-assassinating, leftist pieces of dog shit.
H/T Velvet Hammer VIA IRONIC SURREALISM
Now watch the edited version of Bundy’s remarks as promoted by the left-wing Media Matters and as reported in the NY Times:
(Excerpt) Read more at patdollard.com ...
I haven't heard that one.
That was in one of the two interviews?
I’m waiting to see if Hannity walks this back a bit. If he doesn’t it will lower him in my estimation. On a day to day basis, he’s about the most conservative radio/tv personality that we have advocating conservatism.
Somehow, I have a sense of peace that Bundy will be ok, and that this isn’t over, because these comments aren’t connected at all to the ranch/open range/federal ownership issues.
The BLM will find just as much confrontation from Americans, if they return to Bundy’s ranch, as they did earlier.
Basically it boils down to:
Americans were seeing Bundy as a sympathetic figure and were ok and even supported the “rebellion”
Obama Inc and Harry Reid reached out to the tried-and-true lapdogs in the press to intervene....
and they did. No group is better at character assassination than the Democrats, and ESP this crop of communists we have running the country now.
This don’t mean doodlysquat.
The media has already shouted from the rooftops “RACIST!”
They WILL NOT TAKE IT BACK.
They WILL NOT PRINT THIS STORY.
They got their message out... time to be quiet now.
This is exactly what happened to Sarah Palin.
Somewhat similar to the way the unchallenged media of the early 90’s stoke up hated and fear of the Branch Davidians to justify the deadly attack by the Federal Government that killed 80 men, women and children.
Now, there are many who will cheer if he and his family are gunned down.
You mean just how everyone saw the entire Rodney King video, instead of the few handpicked parts the MSM played over and over again?
Forget it, the Sheeple have gotten their marching orders......Bundy is the new “Emmanuel Goldstein.”
he = Bundy
Conservatives have never really understood that if you scratch the "great interviewer" you'll find just another controlling elite establishment liberal dame.
Leni
We shouldn't wonder why they so quickly latch on to the media narrative.
The same way I handle everything about Bundy and the BLM. I have three separate buckets for my thoughts and beliefs.
The first, and most important, bucket contains the U.S. Constitution, federal overreach, God-given rights, governmental militarization, and the shift from citizens to subjects.
The second bucket contains the current state of the law, and arguments for why it should be changed.
The third, and least important, bucket contains Cliven Bundy, his actions, his statements, and his arguments made in legal documents - but not the arguments made on his behalf by FReepers or supporters. The amnesty statement goes here, along with Bundy's statement that he is not a U.S. citizen, that the 'territory of the United States' has no jurisdiction over him, and so on.
So the NYT’s and the other media, with the government lied to us about this???
And some people still obfuscate and continue to enable this to continue...
Sounds to me like we all need to unplug from the abnormal TV broadcast networks, and Cable networks for that matter, for at least a couple of weeks...Go sit outside in the backyard, enjoy the weather, if you can, and sip on some lemonade...
We all know where this is going...We need to build up our strength and resilience and be ready to fight this tooth and nail if you have the courage to do so...
I believe the tide of opinion is changing in this country, and it has been a long time coming...
It is sad that in this country, a hard working man who believes in personal responsibility and wants the government to leave him alone is verbally crucified.
Its even sadder that the American Media is the one doing it.
sad sad sad
> I knew instinctively what Bundy was probably trying to say, and should have known the NYT was pulling a fast one on the editing.
On Youtube there are a few videos being put out by some of the more intelligent / critical thinking black people who are saying that they understand what Bundy was trying to say. I think they understand that the MSM is being used to “play” their emotions to create division and make them hate the militias. We know this is coming from the WH propaganda machine and why. They want to direct public opinion against the idea of militias for many reasons: (1) it solidifies and reinforces the reasons Americans should be able to buy firearms, (2) it kills their fantasy of disarming citizens, and (3) they don’t want common-folk banding together against their tyrrany and the plans they have for us. Their is no doubt they have the upper hand in terms of weaponry and technology that WE gave them the money to purchase it with, however they know that they can’t use it in a public setting because if they do it will expose them for what they are and their true intentions. For that reason alone, I think they would call in UN troops to shift the blame on them and keep the people from immediately calling for his impeachment.
Don’t forget, FoxNews had been known to lean left more times than not...I would not trust them either...
They may be a little easier on the eyes, but for the most part, they are presenting the same stuff, it is just regurgitated a little differently...
BECK.... Where are your PEOPLE who do research for you. He just said he hasn’t seen the entire clip....Digging a deeper hole for himself......
Right now Glenn Beck (Mahatma Glendhi) is unloading full bore on Cliven Bundy, like he is flanked on the set by Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson - shameful & pitiful.
Go peddle your Doomsday Foods, GB.
Beck is still piling on, damn him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.