1 posted on
04/23/2014 5:04:09 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
Rosemary’s Baby.
Not just a work of fiction any more.
WAY more spooky.
2 posted on
04/23/2014 5:05:49 AM PDT by
alloysteel
(Selective and willful ignorance spells doom, to both victim and perpetrator - mostly the perp.)
To: Kaslin
Surprised that Chelsa didn’t offer the kid up on the abortion alter. That would really make her a raising star.
3 posted on
04/23/2014 5:06:16 AM PDT by
Yorlik803
( Church/Caboose in 2016)
To: Kaslin
How nice....Webb Hubble will have a grandchild.
6 posted on
04/23/2014 5:10:01 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Kaslin
7 posted on
04/23/2014 5:11:09 AM PDT by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: Kaslin
Obvious question for Hillary, “Has Chelsea considered getting an abortion? If not, why not? Is abortion still an option if polling doesn’t show a ‘baby bump’?
8 posted on
04/23/2014 5:11:18 AM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: Kaslin
What?
It’s a “baby”?
It’s an “unborn child”?
Really, lefties?
9 posted on
04/23/2014 5:11:58 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Kaslin
Prediction: Chelsea will have this baby.
12 posted on
04/23/2014 5:13:27 AM PDT by
Biggirl
(“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
To: Kaslin
That Mezvinsky kid will truly be raised by a village. Keep the granddads away from him/her: one’s a convicted felon, the other’s an impeached President.
13 posted on
04/23/2014 5:14:20 AM PDT by
Night Hides Not
(For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
To: Kaslin
The scary thing is that the Clintons and the Mezvinskys will be reproducing.
To: Kaslin
I used to feel some sympathy for Chelsea....my gosh, with those parents, and in the constant public eye? No more. She allowed her wedding to be an attempt at a William/Kate type royal event, even though no one except the media and Clintonistas cared. And now she's letting her pregnancy be a Clinton publicity stunt.
Instead of having very public announcements on TV, it would've been much classier to not announce the pregnancy until there's a baby bump and people notice. It used to be good form to try to keep pregnancies private for the first three months or so.
18 posted on
04/23/2014 5:39:45 AM PDT by
grania
To: Kaslin
How many want to bet that Hillary told Chelsea that now was the time to get knocked up. I bet it was a direct order.
20 posted on
04/23/2014 6:04:01 AM PDT by
KosmicKitty
(WARNING: Hormonally crazed woman ahead!!)
To: Kaslin
Baby? Let’s all be consistent, here. It’s Chelsea Clinton’s fetus!
To: Kaslin
In a sense you really have to feel for this child.
Conceived as a political prop. Sure to be raised by illegal Mexican nannies. Eventually to be trotted out and paraded around as the next link of a legacy chain.
To: Kaslin
25 posted on
04/23/2014 7:07:41 AM PDT by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
To: Kaslin
Baby Nero. All hail little Nero!
Nos morituri te salutamus! Barfbag, please.
To: Kaslin
Too bad she didn't run off with a 1960s hippie radical. That would be news...
No, wait...
-PJ
30 posted on
04/23/2014 2:48:12 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
To: Kaslin
The thought of the Clintons as American royalty makes me want to put in papers at one of the Commonwealth consulates in LA. Or see if the nunciature in Washington will take citizenship apps.
31 posted on
04/23/2014 2:56:28 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Kaslin
Question:
Why is the Progressive world in love with Hillary.
Just asking
33 posted on
04/23/2014 5:11:34 PM PDT by
ripley
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson