Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

Wouldn’t air refueling be cheaper?...............


2 posted on 04/22/2014 12:38:23 PM PDT by Red Badger (Soon there will be another American Civil War. Will make the first one seem like a Tea Party........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

Think Strike Eagle. Except those are some ugly blisters, BAE.

TC


3 posted on 04/22/2014 12:40:58 PM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“Wouldn’t air refueling be cheaper?...”

Might be cheaper, but certainly not applicable in every circumstance.


4 posted on 04/22/2014 12:41:49 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Aerial refueling complicates mission planning. And as the article states the conformal tanks “free up” under wing hard-points for carrying weapons stores.

Some countries considering the purchase of the Euro-fighter Typhoon may also have very little air to air refueling ability.


9 posted on 04/22/2014 1:20:48 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson