[reaganaut1]

Laws will be enforced against some but not others. Will the people stand for it?

[thorvaldr]

Go ahead Harry, tell me that the rule of law exists in the US

[umgud]

But the full weight of gov’t will fall on Bundy.

[2ndDivisionVet]

They’re just now announcing something they started in January 2009?

[napscoordinator]

Will the people stand for it?

Yes. They may yell and scream about it on the internet, but that is it.

[GalaxieFiveHundred]

How the heck else are the Dem-wits gonna build their base?

[CitizenUSA]

Senator Harry Reid: “We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it!”

Ah, but he didn’t say a word about illegals. Unlike us, THEY are free to violate the law and then walk away from it.

Pathetic!

And those same leaders now wonder why Americans no longer respect the rule of law. Why should they? Our leaders spit on the law every day!

[Wolfie]

Maybe they’ll get them back down to George W. Bush levels.

[tumblindice]

Federal jurisprudence has become a sad joke under the Obama clowns, from their judicial and prosecutorial appointments to their abuse of law and failure to enforce the law.

[dragnet2]

For 30+ years now, the government has made American citizenship pointless.

[GOPJ]

People are starting to see it’s NOT liberal compassion here - it’s the desire for cheap labor. Slavery-lite. Once democrats lose the illusion of the moral high ground, they’re toast.

[GOPJ]

People are starting to see it’s NOT liberal compassion here - it’s the desire for cheap labor. Slavery-lite. Once democrats lose the illusion of the moral high ground, they’re toast.

Independents are already moving into areas where they might as well be Republican. We’re coming up on a tipping point.

[Wuli]

“The potential change could shield tens of thousands of immigrants now removed each year solely because of repeated immigration violations, such as re-entering the country after being deported. The change would fall short of deportation curbs demanded by activists frustrated by congressional inaction on immigration legislation.”

The policy would be nothing less than a de facto agreement that (a) the majority of those deported for mere “immigration violations” have a right to be here in the first place and should not have been deported to begin with, and the first that conclusion is based on a corollary erroneous opinion that (b) legal immigration from countries providing most of the illegal immigrants is artificially too low, and the truth is that neither of those positions are supported by the facts.

[newnhdad]

whew.. good thing we didn’t elect Romney...

[ScottinVA]

We are fast becoming a turd-world backwater. Ah well.. we had a nice run.

[ScottinVA]

So the feds will, to the last bullet, fight any attempts to secede, but still reserve the right to flood our country with illegals from damned near everywhere.

We are so f***ed.

[Altura Ct.]

Curbing them? How can you curb what isn’t being done in the first place?

[b4its2late]

Curbing? When did the ramp it up in the first place? NEVER............

[dragnet2]

Upwards of 25,000,000 trespass into the country illegally, violent open borders, creating epic violence and fraud and fedgov wants to curb deportations?

Yet they post snipers around some guys ranch in the middle of no where, tasing and threatening his family over some grazing cows?

When do they start strafing the law abiding legitimate?

[DoughtyOne]

In the mid 1990s I harped on illegal immigration. Boy did I get push-back. Well, here we are folks. Enjoy...

It’s not only the illegal immigration these days. It’s the legal immigration that is swamping us too.

[HiJinx]

"...tens of thousands of immigrants now removed each year..." could easily equate to hundreds of thousands of illegal votes.