Posted on 04/10/2014 5:36:18 PM PDT by kingattax
Allegations of voter fraud fly back and forth in modern American politics, each based on episodic personal observations or on anomalous electoral outcomes. But now for the very first time, comes concrete proof of massive voter fraud in the 2012 election, sufficiently widespread to have tainted over one million votes nationwide.
So far the data does not indicate which side committed the fraud or even whether it was orchestrated at all, but the fact of the fraud is now undeniable.
North Carolina, under the leadership of their Election Board chairman Kim Strach, studied the rolls of those who voted there and compared them with data from 27 other states. The conclusion: 35,750 people voted in North Carolina and also voted in at least one other state in the 2012 election.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightwingnews.com ...
We all knew it that day.
Bump
37000+ people voted in multiple states? and you have the PROOF?!
WHY AREN’T WARRANTS BEING ISSUED?
I betcha Dewey really did defeat Truman too!
Here in Kansas (flyover country to Dickie Morris), we've had proven fraud, at least on the Eastern side of the State Line (Missouri) by people who live on one side of that of the State Line and either own a business or merely work on the other side, believe they have the absolute right to vote in EACH state!
Guess to which party they are registered, actually, you don't need to guess, you already know!
Can’t someone find a mathwizzy statisticion to cull out percentages on the 35+K figure?
I think its if ones’ in a room of 40 there’s VERY high chance someone has matching birth day (not actual full date as in year month day match)
Heck McDonald’s is just airing a commercial where they’ve actually assembled what looks like 50 or so guys named Ronald McDonald for a vid shot - just saw it once and all look between 25-65 (can travel easily) so what’s chance of two of them having been born the very same day?
Libs are doubtless waving fingers about this kind of thing.
I’m thinking 3/4 to 4/5 is real voter fraud / double voting.
Reminds me of Melissa Harris-Perry making a comment on a Saturday show last year where she said she didn’t mind people being double registered because they can’t possibly get in a plane and vote in two states same day. You can’t believe her voice on this and then she breaks off and chortels like a sorority girl w/ her buds about some mundane thing to get to a break.
These people are ruthless pigs.
Dick — If one side wants to protect the integrity of the electoral process with voter ID and the other doesn’t, which side is committing the voter fraud?
How do we know who perpetrated the fraud? Easy. If they were republican votes there would be an army of investigators from the DOJ and it would be playing non stop on PBSCBNBCNN. Holder would be on the case faster than he can cry “racist.” Obama would be giving speeches daily.
“The GOP rino knew this and sat quietly in the corner, they are accomplices”
The fact that nothing was done after Al Gore won 104% of the vote (or something like that) in Philly in 2000 says it all.
WHY AREN’T WARRANTS BEING ISSUED?
What is clearly needed is an interstate effort by local prosecutors to coordinate their investigations of double voters. Let DAs in two states confront the double voters themselves and ask how it is that they voted twice, who helped to facilitate their fraud, did anyone help pay for their travel, did they get compensation for voting twice and so forth.Dick Morris is on my local station after Rush, and I heard his interview with the North Carolina guy. Some of the “double voting” will prove to actually be coincidental and innocent - all they are checking is the name and date of birth, and some people with the same name were born on the same date. Probably only a few, but some.Remember the flak over Bush firing DAs for failing to do what the administration wanted? Back then, we had to remind the Democrats that Clinton had fired all the DAs to cover for the fact that he was killing the Whitewater investigations then ongoing. Turns out, the people Bush fired were refusing to follow up on this evidence.
Voting in multiple state elections is a federal issue as well as a state issue. States can cooperate among themselves to investigate this, and Morris is inserting himself into the issue to try to promote that cooperation. But no two Democrat controlled states will mind terribly if a voter votes Democrat in both states. It being painfully obvious that Democrats do not fear vote fraud because they are sure the Republicans will not outdo them at it.
Let's face it: a great abettor of multiple voting fraud, whether in different states or in the same state, is early voting, which became popular in many states during the Clinton years. Let's get rid of it wherever it exists! (Of course, this should in no way interfere with advocating for other much-needed anti-fraud measures such as photo voter ID.) Integrity of the election process should always be a more important goal for state elections officials than convenience.
Morris is a pretty good statistician and frequently did and does his own polling, including during the 2012 presidential race. On the basis of his polling and that of others, he publicly predicted a comfortable Romney win. Morris intuitively knows that the main reason for the wide divergence between his prognostications and the reported results was fraud and cheating - which you can't pick-up even in the best designed polls. Hopefully, some day he'll get the courage to get into the real truth of the matter, but he doesn't do a very good job here.
It was predicted and the biggest crime was that the GOP-E did absolutely nothing to prevent it from happening.
And here's another revelation: The GOP-E STILL hasn't done anything, consequently the dems will continue and expand their efforts in November. The result is that they won't lose the Senate and the kenyan/indonesian butt boy will be strutting around and arrogantly calling it vindication for his tyranny.
“Let’s face it: a great abettor of multiple voting fraud...in the same state, is early voting, which became popular in many states during the Clinton years. Let’s get rid of it wherever it exists!”
Early voting will not go away. There are too many voters to process them in one day.
Gee whiz, I wouldn't hazzard a guess to which side although all those that turned out 100% of the vote for 0 and all those who voted early and often for the usurper might have had something to do with it. And don't kid yourself the GOP wasn't in on it when they never batted an eye.
If you’re registered in more than one state and one or more has early voting, it’s possible to vote early in one state and on Election Day in the other.
Perhaps, but my bet is that most of the vote fraud lies in mail-in ballots. The get-out-the-vote push is concentrated on registration and the mail in ballots are done rather anonymously. I believe that mail in ballots should be picked up at voting headquarters with someone showing (gasp) a proper voting ID. Period. Yes, there are hardship cases, such as handicap, blind, etc. But that is a small percentage.
I heard Morris interview the NC official who announced the number of nearly-certain double votes. And on the basis of the lack of cooperation from large states - including, incidentally, Texas and Florida - it was clear that the problem could very easily have swung the margin of victory. Morris didn’t go where the data didn’t lead, tho - no party ID data was presented to him, and he did not draw (or at least didn’t articulate) party conclusions from it.
You and I were talking about this a year and a half ago.
What took them so long to figure it out?
Oh no? Really? Really, Dick?
You so sure he's only playing dumb?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.